This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 23 March 2012. Further details are available here. |
I like having this page here and having it linked to Cre-LoxP recombination. I'll introduce a link to this page from the main site.
One describes the process, this page is dedicated to the protein itself. Dr Aaron 22:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
strong keep as above-- Kaushal mehta
Since it's a stub and the other is a complete article, why not combine them. When I searched for "loxp" I was linked to this article but not to Cre-LoxP article. Ideally a search for either Cre recombinase or LoxP would lead to the Cre-LoxP recombination article. I think Cre recombinase is not conceptually seperate enough from it's function on LoxP sites to justify a seperate article. Definitely put the information into the Cre-LoxP recomination article though.
The definition for this entry is exactly the same as the definition of Cre recombinase from the New England Biolabs commercial products site, with the exception that they actually include references, does this not qualify as plagiarism? Ukmarta 09:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
As part of an upgrade of stub articles I propose to improve the page by adding structural information as well as images. Any major objections?
Williamog1990 ( talk) 13:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 23 March 2012. Further details are available here. |
I like having this page here and having it linked to Cre-LoxP recombination. I'll introduce a link to this page from the main site.
One describes the process, this page is dedicated to the protein itself. Dr Aaron 22:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
strong keep as above-- Kaushal mehta
Since it's a stub and the other is a complete article, why not combine them. When I searched for "loxp" I was linked to this article but not to Cre-LoxP article. Ideally a search for either Cre recombinase or LoxP would lead to the Cre-LoxP recombination article. I think Cre recombinase is not conceptually seperate enough from it's function on LoxP sites to justify a seperate article. Definitely put the information into the Cre-LoxP recomination article though.
The definition for this entry is exactly the same as the definition of Cre recombinase from the New England Biolabs commercial products site, with the exception that they actually include references, does this not qualify as plagiarism? Ukmarta 09:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
As part of an upgrade of stub articles I propose to improve the page by adding structural information as well as images. Any major objections?
Williamog1990 ( talk) 13:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)