County Route S18 (California) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"the only major route that allows motorists to drive through, in, and out of the Santa Ana Mountains." Well, there's also the Ortega Highway. Looking at the cited reference (which is a personal story), it seems the writer was referring to "entirely within Orange County". The east end of the Ortega is not in Orange County. But that distinction is lost in the wording of this article.
Not sure of the best fix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.70.193.2 ( talk) 23:33, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Where should El Toro Road be categorized to? -- Artisol2345 00:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Edit: I got it; never mind. Artisol2345 21:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Rschen, why do you believe that El Toro Road should be merged to County Route S18 (California)? 68.4.104.141 ( talk) 00:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
All of El Toro Road is part of CR S18; this probably calls for a merge. Is the road particularly " notable", or is it just a standard suburban arterial? -- NE2 17:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Articles merged. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:County Route S18 (California)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This article meets almost all of the criteria. There are no pictures, but I won't fail or On-hold the article for it. I do wish to see a map request in the next few days however. Anyway, fix the comments listed above and I will pass this article. Thanks. Mitch 32 contribs 12:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the pictures; I'm not a photographer. However, I'll see what I can do about the pre-2008 history. Can you please hold this GA Review until next Monday? I'm kind of busy this week in school, doing homework, and studying for tests. And I really don't have time to address the problem right now. And yes, my username used to be formerly Dabbydabby. Dabby ( talk) 01:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
"Convoluted" - POV removed and sentence reworded. Dabby ( talk) 02:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Delisted. Imzadi 1979 → 08:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
My main issue with this article is that as of this diff is that references 3, 4, 10. 11, 15, & 29 are cited to images / street view, and 5, 20, & 21 are not reliable sources. If this article can be cleaned up I support retaining the article's GA status, else the article will be demoted. -- Admrboltz ( talk)
|format=PDF
should be added. Not all browsers can read PDFs nor do they all insert the PDF icon after the link. There's no publisher or author information on footnote 28. (If retained, the title needs to bre re-rendered in Title Case, not ALLCAPS. Actually the other titles need to be redone in Title Case instead of Sentence case.)There's been a lack of activity or interest for improving this article to retain it's GA status. I'd like to suggest that we move to demoting/delisting it. Imzadi 1979 → 01:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
This article will be demoted tomorrow evening (around 02:00 GMT) if changes are not completed. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 02:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
I summarized and merged this into California County Routes in zone S#S18 by copying the lead and the junction list, updating the infobox. If any additional content should be moved over, it's all available at this revision of the article. Keep in mind that it is now part of a list, and most of the information from the previous article was not needed in the list version of the article and the article was so poorly written that it was delisted as a Good Article with many issues. Please do not recreate this article without discussion. Imzadi 1979 → 08:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
County Route S18 (California) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"the only major route that allows motorists to drive through, in, and out of the Santa Ana Mountains." Well, there's also the Ortega Highway. Looking at the cited reference (which is a personal story), it seems the writer was referring to "entirely within Orange County". The east end of the Ortega is not in Orange County. But that distinction is lost in the wording of this article.
Not sure of the best fix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.70.193.2 ( talk) 23:33, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Where should El Toro Road be categorized to? -- Artisol2345 00:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Edit: I got it; never mind. Artisol2345 21:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Rschen, why do you believe that El Toro Road should be merged to County Route S18 (California)? 68.4.104.141 ( talk) 00:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
All of El Toro Road is part of CR S18; this probably calls for a merge. Is the road particularly " notable", or is it just a standard suburban arterial? -- NE2 17:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Articles merged. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:County Route S18 (California)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This article meets almost all of the criteria. There are no pictures, but I won't fail or On-hold the article for it. I do wish to see a map request in the next few days however. Anyway, fix the comments listed above and I will pass this article. Thanks. Mitch 32 contribs 12:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the pictures; I'm not a photographer. However, I'll see what I can do about the pre-2008 history. Can you please hold this GA Review until next Monday? I'm kind of busy this week in school, doing homework, and studying for tests. And I really don't have time to address the problem right now. And yes, my username used to be formerly Dabbydabby. Dabby ( talk) 01:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
"Convoluted" - POV removed and sentence reworded. Dabby ( talk) 02:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Delisted. Imzadi 1979 → 08:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
My main issue with this article is that as of this diff is that references 3, 4, 10. 11, 15, & 29 are cited to images / street view, and 5, 20, & 21 are not reliable sources. If this article can be cleaned up I support retaining the article's GA status, else the article will be demoted. -- Admrboltz ( talk)
|format=PDF
should be added. Not all browsers can read PDFs nor do they all insert the PDF icon after the link. There's no publisher or author information on footnote 28. (If retained, the title needs to bre re-rendered in Title Case, not ALLCAPS. Actually the other titles need to be redone in Title Case instead of Sentence case.)There's been a lack of activity or interest for improving this article to retain it's GA status. I'd like to suggest that we move to demoting/delisting it. Imzadi 1979 → 01:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
This article will be demoted tomorrow evening (around 02:00 GMT) if changes are not completed. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 02:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC) |
I summarized and merged this into California County Routes in zone S#S18 by copying the lead and the junction list, updating the infobox. If any additional content should be moved over, it's all available at this revision of the article. Keep in mind that it is now part of a list, and most of the information from the previous article was not needed in the list version of the article and the article was so poorly written that it was delisted as a Good Article with many issues. Please do not recreate this article without discussion. Imzadi 1979 → 08:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)