This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 2020 April 29, see discussion. redirect, 26 February 2020, see discussion.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Pulmonology This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles This redirect is supported by the Pulmonology task force. Viruses This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles Disaster management This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Skepticism This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles

I removed the Wuhan Institute of Virology section as it is covered at Misinformation related to the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak and it's bad Wikipedia practice to have the same material on two articles: see WP:REDUNDANTFORK. An IP editor has restored it.

Not only is it bad practice to have the same material twice, but I think having the material here is misleading. "Controversy" implies that there's some possible truth when we're just dealing with a bunch of conspiracy theories. I think the material should remain on the Misinformation article.

Beyond that, I'm not certain I see the point of this article. WP:CRIT warns against Controversy sections and spin-off articles. We would be better covering all the material here elsewhere perhaps. Bondegezou ( talk) 08:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply