From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 ( talk · contribs) 14:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

  • "Symbolist" links to an article describing the art movement
  • "Caion prioritized scandal, accusing Caragiale" - perhaps. "Caion prioritized a scandal, in which he accused Caragiale..." reads better imho
  • What is a "celebrity trial"?
  • What it says - a court trial where a celebrity is involves.
  • "Despite his own flirtations with nationalism," - the underlined word is essay-like and should be replaced
  • " Caion focused his verve on the nationalist literary current in " - how about "his verve on the Transylvanian contemporary nationalist literary"
  • "Caion became a figure of infamy and ridicule in the Romanian context," - repetition of "figure", perhaps "Caion was equated with infamy and ridicule", or something similar
  • " under various pseudonyms: C. A. I. Nică Burduşel, Ion Filionescu, Marin Gelea, Isac Şt. Micu, Roman Muşat etc.[1]" - suggest removal of "etc" and simply state "under various pseudonyms, such as ..."
  • Should "Mage" be in lowercase?
  • The usage of etc is not professional imho
  • "Under contract with Adevărul's publishing house" - redundant
  • "sciolistic amateur.[44]" - socialistic?
  • There are far too many red links, distracting the reader
  • Red links are permitted under the good article criteria and they are only used where there could be a future article on it. Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 13:38, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 ( talk · contribs) 14:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

  • "Symbolist" links to an article describing the art movement
  • "Caion prioritized scandal, accusing Caragiale" - perhaps. "Caion prioritized a scandal, in which he accused Caragiale..." reads better imho
  • What is a "celebrity trial"?
  • What it says - a court trial where a celebrity is involves.
  • "Despite his own flirtations with nationalism," - the underlined word is essay-like and should be replaced
  • " Caion focused his verve on the nationalist literary current in " - how about "his verve on the Transylvanian contemporary nationalist literary"
  • "Caion became a figure of infamy and ridicule in the Romanian context," - repetition of "figure", perhaps "Caion was equated with infamy and ridicule", or something similar
  • " under various pseudonyms: C. A. I. Nică Burduşel, Ion Filionescu, Marin Gelea, Isac Şt. Micu, Roman Muşat etc.[1]" - suggest removal of "etc" and simply state "under various pseudonyms, such as ..."
  • Should "Mage" be in lowercase?
  • The usage of etc is not professional imho
  • "Under contract with Adevărul's publishing house" - redundant
  • "sciolistic amateur.[44]" - socialistic?
  • There are far too many red links, distracting the reader
  • Red links are permitted under the good article criteria and they are only used where there could be a future article on it. Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 13:38, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook