This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 2, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Theodore Roosevelt attacked
Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom for "wild absurdities" like the book's depiction of "camouflaged"
roseate spoonbills (pictured)? |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 09:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
I have read and looked critically at your article and could find little wrong with it. There are however just a few points: Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
--- "bars", done
--- yes, done
--- removed
--- replaced heading
--- split it up, hope that's better.
--- done
--- No, it says that [unsurprisingly, given the tall claims] not all readers were convinced. I've added "sceptically", hope that's clearer.
--- An anonymous reviewer from Smithsonian Art Museum.
--- replaced headings with names of reviewers. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:05, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
That's good. I have not reviewed an article on a book before but it seems to me that the article introduces facts in the lead that are not included in the body of the article. I had a look at the article Lemurs of Madagascar (book), which is an FA, and I see it has an Overview section. I think your article could do with something like this including information about the authors and the circumstances of the book's publication. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
--- Thanks, Cwmhiraeth, it's appreciated. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 2, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Theodore Roosevelt attacked
Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom for "wild absurdities" like the book's depiction of "camouflaged"
roseate spoonbills (pictured)? |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 09:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
I have read and looked critically at your article and could find little wrong with it. There are however just a few points: Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
--- "bars", done
--- yes, done
--- removed
--- replaced heading
--- split it up, hope that's better.
--- done
--- No, it says that [unsurprisingly, given the tall claims] not all readers were convinced. I've added "sceptically", hope that's clearer.
--- An anonymous reviewer from Smithsonian Art Museum.
--- replaced headings with names of reviewers. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:05, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
That's good. I have not reviewed an article on a book before but it seems to me that the article introduces facts in the lead that are not included in the body of the article. I had a look at the article Lemurs of Madagascar (book), which is an FA, and I see it has an Overview section. I think your article could do with something like this including information about the authors and the circumstances of the book's publication. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 06:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
--- Thanks, Cwmhiraeth, it's appreciated. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)