Colorado State Highway 112 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Dough 48 72 02:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I made a few recent edits concerning the references and lengths in the article. If the junction list gives the length to 3 decimal places, then the infobox and other usages should as well. There's no need to round some of the figures, but not all of them.
As for the references, I converted the map references to use {{
cite map}} or {{
bing maps}} instead of {{
cite web}}. I added the |format=PDF
as needed. I found dates for the references that were missing, and harmonized all of the dates to the same format. I assume that the National Geographic map is on paper and not online, so an |accessdate=
parameter should not be used. Additionally, per the guidlines on
overlinking, only one link, on first usage is needed to the Colorado Department of Transportation article. I removed the extras, and put the link on the first usage, and fixed all of the publisher references that weren't correct.
These are all issues that both the nominator and the reviewer should have caught and fixed when this was at GAN. Please keep this in mind for future, similar, nominations. Imzadi 1979 → 02:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
$2/code> and |counties=
infobox parameters. If the maintenance is added to the infobox, then somewhere in the article a mention of CDOT should be used, complete with the CDOT abbreviation in parentheses.
Imzadi
1979
→ 03:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Colorado State Highway 112 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Dough 48 72 02:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I made a few recent edits concerning the references and lengths in the article. If the junction list gives the length to 3 decimal places, then the infobox and other usages should as well. There's no need to round some of the figures, but not all of them.
As for the references, I converted the map references to use {{
cite map}} or {{
bing maps}} instead of {{
cite web}}. I added the |format=PDF
as needed. I found dates for the references that were missing, and harmonized all of the dates to the same format. I assume that the National Geographic map is on paper and not online, so an |accessdate=
parameter should not be used. Additionally, per the guidlines on
overlinking, only one link, on first usage is needed to the Colorado Department of Transportation article. I removed the extras, and put the link on the first usage, and fixed all of the publisher references that weren't correct.
These are all issues that both the nominator and the reviewer should have caught and fixed when this was at GAN. Please keep this in mind for future, similar, nominations. Imzadi 1979 → 02:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
$2/code> and |counties=
infobox parameters. If the maintenance is added to the infobox, then somewhere in the article a mention of CDOT should be used, complete with the CDOT abbreviation in parentheses.
Imzadi
1979
→ 03:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)