Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LauraHale ( talk · contribs) 11:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Please send this through peer review and get assistance from the medical Wikiprojects for sourcing. The lack of being fully sourced means it should not have been nominated to begin with. :( The article has a lot of lists that should be written into prose format. For a medical article, it should have at least 30 different sources that comply with WP:MEDRS. It reads like an essay in the prose parts. Where is the reliable sourcing saying there is little research on this topic? It is worth improving but it needs a fair bit of work, a close examination of WP:GAN, WP:MEDRS criteria and probably going through peer review before being nominated again. I'd estimate about 30 hours worth of work on this to get there. -- LauraHale ( talk) 11:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC) reply