This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Connecticut Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article was mostly developed by me originally, trying to accomodate another editors wishes for the two topics of the City Point neighborhood and one of the two historic districts in the neighborhood being merged in one article. I found it awkward to write. Recently, the other editor has twice edited the article to remove some of the complication, stating "this reads better" in edit summaries. One of the main effects of the edit is to simplify from reality, indeed making it read better perhaps, but at cost of accuracy and completeness. I don't want to edit war about this. I think the proper resolution is to split the neighborhood article from the historic district article, as I originally would have preferred. I prefer it again now strongly to prevent the gamesmanship of editing in this article. -- doncram ( talk) 20:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Historically City Point is Oyster Point and there is no fundamental reason for there to be two articles about the same place. It is quite clear that the article is about the place called City Point the oldest part of which is the historic district. There is no need to explicitly say that. Oyster Point is also no longer in use as a common name so editing to change "also and formerly known as" to just "formerly known as" is perfectly fine. I will add the Howard Avenue link as a see also. -- Polaron | Talk 20:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply