| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: FenrisAureus ( talk · contribs) 11:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
GA review
Last updated: 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) by FenrisAureus
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
1a) the prose is clear, concise, and
understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- 1b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research
- 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
- 2b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- 2c) it contains
no original research
- Sources spot checked for reliability and NOR:
— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Ref # pass/fail 4 ✓ Pass 15 ✓ Pass 16 ✓ Pass 23 ✓ Pass 28 ✓ Pass
- 2d) it contains no
copyright violations or
plagiarism
- Earwig score 2% similarity. [1] Plagarism highly unlikely. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
3) Broad in its coverage
- 3a) it addresses the
main aspects of the topic
- 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style)
4) Neutral:
- 4)
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
- 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
- 6a) media are
tagged with their
copyright statuses, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content
- 6b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions
Overall: Looks good to me. Pass.—
FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (
talk) 07:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments:
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: FenrisAureus ( talk · contribs) 11:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
GA review
Last updated: 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) by FenrisAureus
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
- 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and
understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- 1b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research
- 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
- 2b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- 2c) it contains
no original research
- Sources spot checked for reliability and NOR:
— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Ref # pass/fail 4 ✓ Pass 15 ✓ Pass 16 ✓ Pass 23 ✓ Pass 28 ✓ Pass
- 2d) it contains no
copyright violations or
plagiarism
- Earwig score 2% similarity. [1] Plagarism highly unlikely. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk) 02:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
3) Broad in its coverage
- 3a) it addresses the
main aspects of the topic
- 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style)
4) Neutral:
- 4)
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
- 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
- 6a) media are
tagged with their
copyright statuses, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content
- 6b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions
Overall: Looks good to me. Pass.—
FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (
talk) 07:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments: