This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Historic sites This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine C‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Middle Ages High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Eastern O. High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as High-importance).

A fact from Church of the Holy Apostles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 May 2005. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that until it was looted in 1204 during the Fourth Crusade, the Church of the Holy Apostles was the busiest place of worship in Constantinople? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/May.

Is this the same church as Aghioi Apostoloi Mikroi? Or there were two churches for the Holy Apostles in Constantinople?

The article says Anthemius and Isidorus the Older were the architects of the church. How come when Anthemius died around 534 and the church was built in 550? Could it be that the younger Isidorus built it? Anyway the info is not too certain. -- Bollweevil 21:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC) reply

There exists no confirmed sources other than ones whose so called words, have mostly found their way to us today in mentions of others! Please offer me any real evidence that anyone mentioned in this article or series of articles, has a verified source? I mostly see sources who use the same unverfied sources as sources!

Would not the insertation of these words "It is thought" or "It is believed", or Some people have suggested or proposed thus!"

There has been "NO" archaeological work concerning the present site of what is now "presumed" to have been this edifice!

If I am wrong, then please present us with some "evidence" that can stand some scruntity! Regards, 96.19.147.40 ( talk) 22:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes reply

By reading the text, it appears that something essential is missing in the article, i.e where are the tombs of all these people (beginning from Constantine I), someone can assume that they are still found there. Alexikoua ( talk) 08:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Not likely. By the time of their exhumation by the Ottomans, the bodies had long turned to dust and the tombs were no longer respected - way was made for Muslim building projects. What happened to the sarcophagi isn't recorded. 50.111.46.18 ( talk) 11:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC) reply