This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
What a fucking mess!! Cholera in itself is not a panddemic. so the category cshould befremoved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.189.101.254 ( talk) 02:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
Rummskartoffel (
talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I suggest to remove the "further reading" list. Any important references should already be in the in-line citations list. EMsmile ( talk) 01:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
I think the section on "health policy" is too hidden under Society and culture and should be moved up to become part of "prevention". Under Society and culture, I expect more trivia, notable people, arts, culture and so forth but not important information on how to prevent the spread of cholera. Does anyone object to me moving it? EMsmile ( talk) 01:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:Graham Beards I see you are making this change to a range of articles, including the cholera article: "removed redundant hidden comments". I just wonder why you are removing them? I felt that they did serve a purpose. The purpose was to help new and old editors to remember which sections should be summarised in the lead. I thought those hidden comments were quite useful, and most of those leads were better than for the average Wikipedia article. I was under the impression that it was a standard thing done by WikiProject Medicine. Is there a particular reason why you are removing them all? I found them useful. But maybe mine is a minority view. EMsmile ( talk) 00:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Cholera has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2401:4900:599D:84FE:0:0:43C:735D ( talk) 05:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Cholera has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Humans are the only animal affected." To "humans are the only known host for [the bacteria.]" The revised sentence would be more true to the source that the original sentence comes from (it's almost a direct quote so perhaps not that sentence exactly). In any case the original sentence is an absolute. 98.215.110.214 ( talk) 04:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This was a really informative article. Cheers to the people who created it. Vividuppers ( talk) 11:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
What a fucking mess!! Cholera in itself is not a panddemic. so the category cshould befremoved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.189.101.254 ( talk) 02:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
Rummskartoffel (
talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I suggest to remove the "further reading" list. Any important references should already be in the in-line citations list. EMsmile ( talk) 01:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
I think the section on "health policy" is too hidden under Society and culture and should be moved up to become part of "prevention". Under Society and culture, I expect more trivia, notable people, arts, culture and so forth but not important information on how to prevent the spread of cholera. Does anyone object to me moving it? EMsmile ( talk) 01:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:Graham Beards I see you are making this change to a range of articles, including the cholera article: "removed redundant hidden comments". I just wonder why you are removing them? I felt that they did serve a purpose. The purpose was to help new and old editors to remember which sections should be summarised in the lead. I thought those hidden comments were quite useful, and most of those leads were better than for the average Wikipedia article. I was under the impression that it was a standard thing done by WikiProject Medicine. Is there a particular reason why you are removing them all? I found them useful. But maybe mine is a minority view. EMsmile ( talk) 00:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Cholera has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2401:4900:599D:84FE:0:0:43C:735D ( talk) 05:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Cholera has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Humans are the only animal affected." To "humans are the only known host for [the bacteria.]" The revised sentence would be more true to the source that the original sentence comes from (it's almost a direct quote so perhaps not that sentence exactly). In any case the original sentence is an absolute. 98.215.110.214 ( talk) 04:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This was a really informative article. Cheers to the people who created it. Vividuppers ( talk) 11:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)