This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
September_17 says: 1394 - King Charles VI of France orders all Jews expelled from France. There is no mention of this on this page though. Thehalfone 09:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I know about the 1420 Treaty, but Henry VI of England shown as Charles VI's successor? Jeepers. GoodDay ( talk) 00:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Le Bien-Aimé does not translate into English as "the Well-loved" (nor as "Well-beloved"). It translates simply as: "Beloved", according to Le Robert & Collins Senior, 6e édition, Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert-VUEF, 2002. I have made the appropriate correction in the article. Charvex ( talk) 23:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
There's a minor discrepancy in the descriptions. Here, it is said: "Another, Jean son of the Lord de Nantouillet, saved himself by jumping into a dishwater tub" The article Bal des Ardents, however, claims it was a wine vat. A little thing, but a contradiction nevertheless. -- Oop ( talk) 23:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
"Many historians have misinterpreted this treaty and the disinheriting of the Dauphin Charles. The Dauphin sealed his fate, in the eyes of the king, by committing treason: he declared himself regent, usurped royal authority, and refused to obey the king's order to return to Paris.[12] It is important to remember that when the Treaty of Troyes was finalized in May 1420, the Dauphin Charles was only 17 years' old. He was then a weak figure who was easily manipulated by his advisors."
There are issues of clarity with these sentences, but I'm presuming that the second sentence above is meant to be the "misinterpreted" viewpoint. It is also unclear why the one source cited should be considered authoritative over the "Many historians" who interpreted the treaty differently. More research needs to be represented or a further explanation of the reasoning is needed. Mm1dd2 ( talk) 10:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
She actually died in January 1437, as her own Wikipedia page and several authoritative sources state. It is critical to her legal inability to remarry, under the 1426 statute, until Henry VI came of age, which happened AFTER her death (cited both by Harriss and Ashdown-Hill). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smlark ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles VI of France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Does anyone know if any modern historians and psychologists have attempted to diagnose what exactly he was suffering from? It should be added to the article. Just my $0.02. Bill the Cat 7 ( talk) 01:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
The headings are too long with these kings... There is no need of such a long introduction. Kapeter77 ( talk) 02:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I was looking through Wikimedia and found charters of Philip VI of France, Charles V of France, and Charles VI of France. They all have the kings seals but they also have what looks like signatures beside the seals. Are those the signatures of the kings? ✠ Robertus Pius ✠ ( Talk • Contribs) 19:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
September_17 says: 1394 - King Charles VI of France orders all Jews expelled from France. There is no mention of this on this page though. Thehalfone 09:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I know about the 1420 Treaty, but Henry VI of England shown as Charles VI's successor? Jeepers. GoodDay ( talk) 00:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Le Bien-Aimé does not translate into English as "the Well-loved" (nor as "Well-beloved"). It translates simply as: "Beloved", according to Le Robert & Collins Senior, 6e édition, Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert-VUEF, 2002. I have made the appropriate correction in the article. Charvex ( talk) 23:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
There's a minor discrepancy in the descriptions. Here, it is said: "Another, Jean son of the Lord de Nantouillet, saved himself by jumping into a dishwater tub" The article Bal des Ardents, however, claims it was a wine vat. A little thing, but a contradiction nevertheless. -- Oop ( talk) 23:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
"Many historians have misinterpreted this treaty and the disinheriting of the Dauphin Charles. The Dauphin sealed his fate, in the eyes of the king, by committing treason: he declared himself regent, usurped royal authority, and refused to obey the king's order to return to Paris.[12] It is important to remember that when the Treaty of Troyes was finalized in May 1420, the Dauphin Charles was only 17 years' old. He was then a weak figure who was easily manipulated by his advisors."
There are issues of clarity with these sentences, but I'm presuming that the second sentence above is meant to be the "misinterpreted" viewpoint. It is also unclear why the one source cited should be considered authoritative over the "Many historians" who interpreted the treaty differently. More research needs to be represented or a further explanation of the reasoning is needed. Mm1dd2 ( talk) 10:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
She actually died in January 1437, as her own Wikipedia page and several authoritative sources state. It is critical to her legal inability to remarry, under the 1426 statute, until Henry VI came of age, which happened AFTER her death (cited both by Harriss and Ashdown-Hill). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smlark ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles VI of France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Does anyone know if any modern historians and psychologists have attempted to diagnose what exactly he was suffering from? It should be added to the article. Just my $0.02. Bill the Cat 7 ( talk) 01:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
The headings are too long with these kings... There is no need of such a long introduction. Kapeter77 ( talk) 02:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I was looking through Wikimedia and found charters of Philip VI of France, Charles V of France, and Charles VI of France. They all have the kings seals but they also have what looks like signatures beside the seals. Are those the signatures of the kings? ✠ Robertus Pius ✠ ( Talk • Contribs) 19:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)