This article was nominated for deletion on 10 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.c4ads.org. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011090810013452. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

• Info on c4ads.org permitted to describe CADS fellows on the Center for Advanced Defense Studies' Wikipedia article. 66.253.45.4 ( talk) 16:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC) reply

This organization has very little web presence already. It doesn't seem to be particularly influential, although they announce on their web page that they have received a Grant from either Eric Schmidt or Google, and they have multiple representatives appearing in Media. ^[1] For this reason alone, I think this is worth developing more, but the lack of online information will make it difficult.

I added an organizational box so that at least the little information available would be readily accessible. Polscicontrib ( talk) 17:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC) reply