This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Vladimir Lenin believed that literature and art could be exploited for ideological and political as well as educational purposes."
Exploited is a totally unsuitable word for a supposedly unbiased article. I have changed this to: "Vladimir Lenin believed that literature and art could be used for ideological and political as well as educational purposes." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.213.54 ( talk • contribs) 01:15, 3 August 2006
This article, considering the importance of the subject matter, is in a surprisingly stubbish state. It doesn't mention several important things. For example:
Not all of these points are necessarily accurate as I've heard most of them from hearsay (not academic sources), but I thought I'd put them out here anyway. Some of this stuff should be added to the article if references to back it up can be found. Esn 03:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Google search "Censorship in the USSR" and "Censorship in the Soviet Union" gives several useful links as well, eg
Etc. `' mikkanarxi 04:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, the article about censorship in the US is about 10 times longer than this one. Thepatriots 19:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I think that this page should be merged with Censorship of images in the Soviet Union, because that deal with the same subject and use the same pictures for emphasis. They are just separate views of the subject that would be better off supplementing each other than being separate articles. -- 69.94.169.40 ( talk) 19:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
"There were cases of literary hoaxes, when authors imagined a translated source. Poet Vladimir Lifschitz, for instance, imagined some British poet James Clifford, died 1944 in Western Front, whose translations he published, though it was his own verses", says the article. But Vladimir Lifschitz's son Lev Losev mentioning this situation says in "Упорная жизнь Джемса Клиффорда: возвращение одной мистификации" http://magazines.russ.ru/zvezda/2001/1/losev.html, "И тут Владимиру Лифшицу повезло. Он наткнулся на поэтическое наследие своего погодка, англичанина Джемса Клиффорда. Погибший на фронте в 1944 году Клиффорд с большой точностью и с недоступной советскому поэту свободой выразил в своих стихах как раз те переживания, которые всё не находили адекватного выхода в творчестве моего отца. Он мастерски перевел двадцать стихотворений Джемса Клиффорда. Ключевым было, несомненно, стихотворение “Отступление в Арденнах”. Thus the poet James Clifford killed in action in 1944 was NOT a hoax! Only some of "his" poems as published in Lifschitz's translations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.78.103 ( talk) 20:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
15 referenced (7 different ones), pre-2001. Xx236 ( talk) 06:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Xx236 ( talk) 06:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
There existed three levels of censorship:
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Vladimir Lenin believed that literature and art could be exploited for ideological and political as well as educational purposes."
Exploited is a totally unsuitable word for a supposedly unbiased article. I have changed this to: "Vladimir Lenin believed that literature and art could be used for ideological and political as well as educational purposes." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.213.54 ( talk • contribs) 01:15, 3 August 2006
This article, considering the importance of the subject matter, is in a surprisingly stubbish state. It doesn't mention several important things. For example:
Not all of these points are necessarily accurate as I've heard most of them from hearsay (not academic sources), but I thought I'd put them out here anyway. Some of this stuff should be added to the article if references to back it up can be found. Esn 03:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Google search "Censorship in the USSR" and "Censorship in the Soviet Union" gives several useful links as well, eg
Etc. `' mikkanarxi 04:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, the article about censorship in the US is about 10 times longer than this one. Thepatriots 19:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I think that this page should be merged with Censorship of images in the Soviet Union, because that deal with the same subject and use the same pictures for emphasis. They are just separate views of the subject that would be better off supplementing each other than being separate articles. -- 69.94.169.40 ( talk) 19:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
"There were cases of literary hoaxes, when authors imagined a translated source. Poet Vladimir Lifschitz, for instance, imagined some British poet James Clifford, died 1944 in Western Front, whose translations he published, though it was his own verses", says the article. But Vladimir Lifschitz's son Lev Losev mentioning this situation says in "Упорная жизнь Джемса Клиффорда: возвращение одной мистификации" http://magazines.russ.ru/zvezda/2001/1/losev.html, "И тут Владимиру Лифшицу повезло. Он наткнулся на поэтическое наследие своего погодка, англичанина Джемса Клиффорда. Погибший на фронте в 1944 году Клиффорд с большой точностью и с недоступной советскому поэту свободой выразил в своих стихах как раз те переживания, которые всё не находили адекватного выхода в творчестве моего отца. Он мастерски перевел двадцать стихотворений Джемса Клиффорда. Ключевым было, несомненно, стихотворение “Отступление в Арденнах”. Thus the poet James Clifford killed in action in 1944 was NOT a hoax! Only some of "his" poems as published in Lifschitz's translations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.78.103 ( talk) 20:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
15 referenced (7 different ones), pre-2001. Xx236 ( talk) 06:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Xx236 ( talk) 06:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
There existed three levels of censorship:
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)