This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Cardiology / Pulmonology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Health and fitness Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think some of the information can be broken up and taken out of the introduction. For example, instead of discussing in depth all of the different ways to assess CRF, you can briefly mention the different ways in the introduction and then go into greater depth further down the article. I think it's good form to have a section of detail in the body for every topic mentioned in the introduction, and that will help readers find what's important to them in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TachZav ( talk • contribs) 02:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC) reply

okay so im doin this assignment for my gym teacher it is taking forever so is there any other names for this type of fitness?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.130.19 ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC) reply

um i think that this type of fitness is related closely to the aerobic capacity fitness component. i'm doing an assignment for school and my teacher said to talk about this as well as the aerobic fitness component. this is probably a bit late but i was bored so yer lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.109.209 ( talk) 06:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Is there any interaction between cardiovascular and respiratory? i need i for an assignment —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.170.151.156 ( talk) 22:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

i have an assignment i have to do also.. a 4 page assignment on cardiorespitory fitness. how am i supposed to get 4 pages!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.240.20 ( talk) 15:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 November 2022 and 17 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Thakkaroms3 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: TachZav.

— Assignment last updated by Ewingdo 05:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2023 and 17 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nufris10 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nufris10 ( talk) 18:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm planning on expanding this article and adding the following sections: cellular basis for cardiorespiratory fitness, health benefits, exercise as a means of improving CRF, and medical considerations. I also hope to expand on the "measurement" section and offer some revision for clarity of the current article's state.

I have the following concern regarding the first paragraph of the "measurement" section. What method of CRF measurement is the text referring to, specifically. I think that the paragraph could use some revision to make it more accessible in plain language and for clarity, along with more citations. Nufris10 ( talk) 18:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC) reply