This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"However, not all such lenses require the shorter back focus, and may feature the standard EF mount."
Any examples? I thought all EF-mount lens were designed for 35mm. (All EF-S lenses are designed for APS-C, of course.) There were a few EF lenses designed for APS film way back when, I believe, but not digital APS-C in particular.
--22:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I would love to see a list of pros and cons compared to EF lenses, to help in buying decisions. Also, I have read elsewhere about some sort of "1.6x crop factor" with EF-S lenses -- what is that all about? 76.102.95.104 17:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Removed the duplicate information concerning the mounting of the EF-S lens on to bodies that were not designed for it as its well covered in the previous paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.56 ( talk) 14:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone have technical drawings to accompany this article? I've looked around a bit but haven't found a good drawing anywhere. If anyone knows of a drawing, please add it to this article. neffk ( talk) 05:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Are these lenses approximately image-space telecentric? It sounds like some might be. —Ben FrantzDale ( talk) 14:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Do we really need one article for each EF-S lens? Since they're all currently stubs except 17-55mm, and since the stats could be summarised into an expanded table on this page, I'm of the opinion we could include any interesting stuff on this page. Thoughts? Jon ( talk) 06:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
It is written that it fits on APS-C and not on 35 mm full frame, but what about APS-H? -- 92.74.20.221 ( talk) 18:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"However, not all such lenses require the shorter back focus, and may feature the standard EF mount."
Any examples? I thought all EF-mount lens were designed for 35mm. (All EF-S lenses are designed for APS-C, of course.) There were a few EF lenses designed for APS film way back when, I believe, but not digital APS-C in particular.
--22:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I would love to see a list of pros and cons compared to EF lenses, to help in buying decisions. Also, I have read elsewhere about some sort of "1.6x crop factor" with EF-S lenses -- what is that all about? 76.102.95.104 17:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Removed the duplicate information concerning the mounting of the EF-S lens on to bodies that were not designed for it as its well covered in the previous paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.56 ( talk) 14:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone have technical drawings to accompany this article? I've looked around a bit but haven't found a good drawing anywhere. If anyone knows of a drawing, please add it to this article. neffk ( talk) 05:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Are these lenses approximately image-space telecentric? It sounds like some might be. —Ben FrantzDale ( talk) 14:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Do we really need one article for each EF-S lens? Since they're all currently stubs except 17-55mm, and since the stats could be summarised into an expanded table on this page, I'm of the opinion we could include any interesting stuff on this page. Thoughts? Jon ( talk) 06:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
It is written that it fits on APS-C and not on 35 mm full frame, but what about APS-H? -- 92.74.20.221 ( talk) 18:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)