This page was proposed for deletion by Extraordinary Writ ( talk · contribs) on 13 January 2021.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the |unref= parameter from this template. Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

@ Extraordinary Writ: I am finding more sources that you did; not huge amounts (mostly minor sources), and possibly not enough to mee WP:ORG, but enough to question your specifically-stated PROD basis. Possibly you searched for "California Trout", and not their shortened name, "CalTrout".

• "Popular Sport Fish May Be Headed for Broad Extinction in California", Scientific American
• "CalTrout wants old Scott Dam on Eel River removed to help salmon and steelhead", Santa Rosa Press Democrat
• "Scott Dam in Lake County listed by CalTrout among top 5 dams to remove to benefit fish, habitat", Lake County News

...just to pick the first three worthy of note. Here's my search. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 00:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

That's fair enough; I'll revert the PROD. It's a close one - there's not a lot about the organization itself, as opposed to occasional mentions in a story about environmental issues - but there's definitely enough to save it from PROD. A trip to AFD might be a good idea eventually, but I'll leave it alone for now in the hope that someone will come along and improve the article. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply