From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

This article reads like a newspaper article by someone with an axe to grind. It needs cutting.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleutherius ( talkcontribs) 23:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Any (signed) suggestions as to what should be changed? Brocach ( talk) 00:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Needs proper organising and splitting up into relevant sub-sections to make it easier to read. Could also do with pictures. Does read as Eleutherius' auggests - any reasons as to why Brocach seeing as your behind the article and addition of wikilinks to many articles? Mabuska (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
It already has lede plus two sections, which seems to me to be about standard for articles of this length. Not sure that much is to be gained by breaking it into bite-size chunks, nor that public domain pictures illustrating the work of a lobbying organisation can easily be located. However, it is still a very young article and I am sure that it will improve over time as others contribute. Brocach ( talk) 23:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Activities section

It appears that many of the in-line citations for the Activities section simply link to the Wikipedia page of the cited source and provide no other information, such as the title of the article. I would encourage the editor who added those citations to add more information. Moonboy54 ( talk) 14:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

This article reads like a newspaper article by someone with an axe to grind. It needs cutting.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleutherius ( talkcontribs) 23:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Any (signed) suggestions as to what should be changed? Brocach ( talk) 00:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Needs proper organising and splitting up into relevant sub-sections to make it easier to read. Could also do with pictures. Does read as Eleutherius' auggests - any reasons as to why Brocach seeing as your behind the article and addition of wikilinks to many articles? Mabuska (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
It already has lede plus two sections, which seems to me to be about standard for articles of this length. Not sure that much is to be gained by breaking it into bite-size chunks, nor that public domain pictures illustrating the work of a lobbying organisation can easily be located. However, it is still a very young article and I am sure that it will improve over time as others contribute. Brocach ( talk) 23:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Activities section

It appears that many of the in-line citations for the Activities section simply link to the Wikipedia page of the cited source and provide no other information, such as the title of the article. I would encourage the editor who added those citations to add more information. Moonboy54 ( talk) 14:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook