This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added some pics to liven it up, as I have with the rest of the topics on the Byzantine Template, done some polishing to Byzantine Medicine as well.
It looks like Wetman reverted the addition of several images from the article [1], but I'm not clear on how the reason corresponds with the removal. Can you let us know? Thanks! Demi T/ C 01:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
If you people want to copy articles from other encyclopedias, say, the catholic encyclopedia
[2], you can at least try to do it right. Copy the text as it is in the original source (and cite the source), do not copy what you like and change what you don't like.
user:anon. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
83.157.191.175 (
talk) 23:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
There is a stub for this which has a long article in the Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I speak of this sentence (footnote removed):
"Although popular Byzantine literature and early Modern Greek literature both began in the 11th century, the two are indistinguishable."
Could anyone please tell me if using italics in this way is in accordance with the Wikipedia Manual of Style's rules on the usage of italics for emphasis? I think it is, but I want to be absolutely sure.-- Thylacine24 ( talk) 13:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added some pics to liven it up, as I have with the rest of the topics on the Byzantine Template, done some polishing to Byzantine Medicine as well.
It looks like Wetman reverted the addition of several images from the article [1], but I'm not clear on how the reason corresponds with the removal. Can you let us know? Thanks! Demi T/ C 01:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
If you people want to copy articles from other encyclopedias, say, the catholic encyclopedia
[2], you can at least try to do it right. Copy the text as it is in the original source (and cite the source), do not copy what you like and change what you don't like.
user:anon. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
83.157.191.175 (
talk) 23:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
There is a stub for this which has a long article in the Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I speak of this sentence (footnote removed):
"Although popular Byzantine literature and early Modern Greek literature both began in the 11th century, the two are indistinguishable."
Could anyone please tell me if using italics in this way is in accordance with the Wikipedia Manual of Style's rules on the usage of italics for emphasis? I think it is, but I want to be absolutely sure.-- Thylacine24 ( talk) 13:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)