This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Is related to:
by University of Arkansas - phys.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:587:410b:c290:5918:f010:9a03:72e9 ( talk) 23:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
In the subsection Brownian_motion#Einstein's_theory, at the first line of the Taylor Series expansion, we have the following equality:
On the right hand side, why do we have insted of ?, since Einstein himself derived the Diffusion Equation from [1] .
Zaphodxvii ( talk) 04:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
References
To editor UiawsbdNicoDude: Wikipedia takes a dim view of self-proclaimed experts because we only regurgitate sources. If you have a disagreement with content, please explain if you think a cited source is not reliable, if you think the content does not accurately summarize what the source says, or if you have better sources. I ask all new editors to temper their enthusiasm with humility, as we have a system here that has worked for twenty years and we do not need your lack of collaboration. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman ( talk) 04:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
The article is reasonably well-writtenand #6 states,
The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Is related to:
by University of Arkansas - phys.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:587:410b:c290:5918:f010:9a03:72e9 ( talk) 23:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
In the subsection Brownian_motion#Einstein's_theory, at the first line of the Taylor Series expansion, we have the following equality:
On the right hand side, why do we have insted of ?, since Einstein himself derived the Diffusion Equation from [1] .
Zaphodxvii ( talk) 04:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
References
To editor UiawsbdNicoDude: Wikipedia takes a dim view of self-proclaimed experts because we only regurgitate sources. If you have a disagreement with content, please explain if you think a cited source is not reliable, if you think the content does not accurately summarize what the source says, or if you have better sources. I ask all new editors to temper their enthusiasm with humility, as we have a system here that has worked for twenty years and we do not need your lack of collaboration. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman ( talk) 04:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
The article is reasonably well-writtenand #6 states,
The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.