This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Reproductive This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force. Women's Health This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article looks to be written as a first-hand casual introduction to the topic, rather than an independently sourced encyclopaedia entry. Skomorokh 08:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC) reply

I am employed by BMFMS and have permission to use information from the website www.bmfms.org.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffal ( talk • contribs) 23:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply

In principle BMFMS could license the content as described at WP:DCM, but doing so might be a waste of effort, for the page probably needs to be rewritten as an encyclopedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TEB728 ( talk • contribs) 17:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.bmfms.org.uk. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011060210017358. This ticket covers material submitted by Wikipedia user Jeffal that is from the aformentioned website This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

- Peripitus (Talk) 12:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Maternal and Fetal Medicine Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130715185514/http://obstetricmedicine.org.uk to http://www.obstetricmedicine.org.uk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130715181938/http://bapm.org.uk to http://www.bapm.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC) reply