Bristol Cathedral has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 21, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the offical name, and wiki policy is to use the offical name.-- Jirate 21:26, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)
Shouldnt there be mention of the organ somewhere? its supposed to be the largest working one in the world I think - Agaib
p.s. sign using ~~~~ rather than writing your name
have done some rearranging of facts, but haven't lost any of your work!
Hope you like it! -- Amandajm 14:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I removed the gallery from this article as per WP:IUP#Photo_galleries, article space should not contain image galleries unless there is a good reason to. The two images here can easily be put inline, and don't add anything to the article that isn't already shown in other images. Galleries should be created on commons - that's sort of what it's there for. - mattbuck ( Talk) 19:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Amandajm reverted my previous removal of links to photo sites from this article. I stand by that deletion because those photo sites fail WP:EL, mostly because they fail on the very first of the criteria - Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article. But I could have removed this link because its sole purpose is to promote hotels and accommodation. The panavista.eu link is to just one photo which hardly adds value. As for flickr, if there are any useful photos there, then why not take some of the 154 flickr images which have a Wikimedia Commons compatible licence and copy them over? Bottom line I don't think any of the photo links truly add value to the article. -- Simple Bob ( talk) 07:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
All uploaded. Anyone else have suggestions? -- Simple Bob ( talk) 21:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for Bristol Cathedral: Coordinates are wrong. Building is misplaced. Right coordinates are: +51° 27' 6.26", -2° 36' 2.61" (51.451740, -2.600724)
— 93.194.219.97 ( talk) 18:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
latd = 51.4517 longd = -2.6007
You are invited to the Bristol Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Commercial Rooms, 43-45 Corn Street, Bristol BS1 1HT on Sunday 28 July 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Bristol topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I've been doing some editing on this article and hope to nominate it for GA status before long. I know there are still a few citation needed tags but what else do people think would be needed to get it to meet the Good article criteria?— Rod talk 15:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
As requested, I'e had a quick look through it, I've never seen the building and know nothing about it, but from a cursory glance:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: José Galindo ( talk · contribs) 23:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm on this --
José Galindo (
talk) 23:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Well-written article | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | Complete | Pass |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | Complete | Pass |
(c) (original research) | Complete | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | Complete | Pass |
(b) (focused) | Complete | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Excellent | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
This article is fully stable as it is not undergoing any major changes, edit wars, or content disputes | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | All images are used legally. | Pass |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | All images are used appropriately with suitable captions. | Pass |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
Pass | Nice article, simple, precise. |
Thanks for putting a pass next to each criteria; however not all are green in the review progress box at the top and I am unsure whether there are any changes you feel are needed to meet the criteria.— Rod talk 06:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bristol Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bristol Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
It is said that Giles Gilbert Scott was consulted in 1860 but he was born only in 1880. Some mistake feel I here. Elrond1 2eleven ( talk) 09:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Bristol Cathedral has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 21, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the offical name, and wiki policy is to use the offical name.-- Jirate 21:26, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)
Shouldnt there be mention of the organ somewhere? its supposed to be the largest working one in the world I think - Agaib
p.s. sign using ~~~~ rather than writing your name
have done some rearranging of facts, but haven't lost any of your work!
Hope you like it! -- Amandajm 14:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I removed the gallery from this article as per WP:IUP#Photo_galleries, article space should not contain image galleries unless there is a good reason to. The two images here can easily be put inline, and don't add anything to the article that isn't already shown in other images. Galleries should be created on commons - that's sort of what it's there for. - mattbuck ( Talk) 19:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Amandajm reverted my previous removal of links to photo sites from this article. I stand by that deletion because those photo sites fail WP:EL, mostly because they fail on the very first of the criteria - Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article. But I could have removed this link because its sole purpose is to promote hotels and accommodation. The panavista.eu link is to just one photo which hardly adds value. As for flickr, if there are any useful photos there, then why not take some of the 154 flickr images which have a Wikimedia Commons compatible licence and copy them over? Bottom line I don't think any of the photo links truly add value to the article. -- Simple Bob ( talk) 07:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
All uploaded. Anyone else have suggestions? -- Simple Bob ( talk) 21:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for Bristol Cathedral: Coordinates are wrong. Building is misplaced. Right coordinates are: +51° 27' 6.26", -2° 36' 2.61" (51.451740, -2.600724)
— 93.194.219.97 ( talk) 18:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
latd = 51.4517 longd = -2.6007
You are invited to the Bristol Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Commercial Rooms, 43-45 Corn Street, Bristol BS1 1HT on Sunday 28 July 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Bristol topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I've been doing some editing on this article and hope to nominate it for GA status before long. I know there are still a few citation needed tags but what else do people think would be needed to get it to meet the Good article criteria?— Rod talk 15:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
As requested, I'e had a quick look through it, I've never seen the building and know nothing about it, but from a cursory glance:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: José Galindo ( talk · contribs) 23:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm on this --
José Galindo (
talk) 23:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Well-written article | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | Complete | Pass |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | Complete | Pass |
(c) (original research) | Complete | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | Complete | Pass |
(b) (focused) | Complete | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Excellent | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
This article is fully stable as it is not undergoing any major changes, edit wars, or content disputes | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | All images are used legally. | Pass |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | All images are used appropriately with suitable captions. | Pass |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
Pass | Nice article, simple, precise. |
Thanks for putting a pass next to each criteria; however not all are green in the review progress box at the top and I am unsure whether there are any changes you feel are needed to meet the criteria.— Rod talk 06:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bristol Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bristol Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
It is said that Giles Gilbert Scott was consulted in 1860 but he was born only in 1880. Some mistake feel I here. Elrond1 2eleven ( talk) 09:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)