 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Why did you merge the "Bratz Babyz: The Movie" page with the general Bratz Dollz page? The original page was doing just fine before the merging. You took away the notes, box-art and everything! This is even worse then it was before... ThegreatWakkorati ( talk) 17:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Merging the Bratz Babyz: the Movie information with the general Bratz Babyz page was nothing short of a reckless idea.
We need the pages properly seperated in case someone (like me) had a bevy of information to add that would simply steal the spotlight of the entire page away. Besides, no one ever gave me a good reason why they suddenly decided to merge... ThegreatWakkorati ( talk) 16:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Proposed redirection to List of Bratz characters
Further to the AfD discussion on Ciara (Bratz character), I propose that all the Bratz character doll/doll collection pages be blanked and redirected to List of Bratz characters. Note, I'm not suggesting merging because the content on the subpages is either duplicated there already or is just too detailed to justify inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Please discuss at Talk:List of Bratz characters to avoid duplication. Espresso Addict 02:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Maybe once the list of the Bratz Babyz products will be too long, and have its own article, like the list of the original, teenage Bratz products do. 86.101.211.226 18:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Babyz Banner-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Babyz Banner-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bratz Babyz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605223158/http://wcbstv.com/watercooler/Bratz.Jade.Expletives.2.240942.html to http://wcbstv.com/watercooler/Bratz.Jade.Expletives.2.240942.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why did you merge the "Bratz Babyz: The Movie" page with the general Bratz Dollz page? The original page was doing just fine before the merging. You took away the notes, box-art and everything! This is even worse then it was before... ThegreatWakkorati ( talk) 17:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Merging the Bratz Babyz: the Movie information with the general Bratz Babyz page was nothing short of a reckless idea.
We need the pages properly seperated in case someone (like me) had a bevy of information to add that would simply steal the spotlight of the entire page away. Besides, no one ever gave me a good reason why they suddenly decided to merge... ThegreatWakkorati ( talk) 16:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Proposed redirection to List of Bratz characters
Further to the AfD discussion on Ciara (Bratz character), I propose that all the Bratz character doll/doll collection pages be blanked and redirected to List of Bratz characters. Note, I'm not suggesting merging because the content on the subpages is either duplicated there already or is just too detailed to justify inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Please discuss at Talk:List of Bratz characters to avoid duplication. Espresso Addict 02:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Maybe once the list of the Bratz Babyz products will be too long, and have its own article, like the list of the original, teenage Bratz products do. 86.101.211.226 18:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Babyz Banner-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Babyz Banner-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bratz Babyz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605223158/http://wcbstv.com/watercooler/Bratz.Jade.Expletives.2.240942.html to http://wcbstv.com/watercooler/Bratz.Jade.Expletives.2.240942.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)