| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boogie with Stu redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
If I recall correctly, Ian Stewart was present for this song because the band employed him also for "Rock and Roll" on IV. I'm not sure, so I'll let someone else add that to the article.
- Yes, indeed. Both were recorded between Dec 1970 and Feb1971. Other stuff: The acoustic guitar could also have been played by John Paul Jones. I really don't hear any bass guitar (verified trhough personal spectral anylysis) sound (just of the bass drum and acoustic guitar). So my personnel section would be:
- Robert Plant - vocals, handclaps + laugh at the end
- Jimmy Page - mandolin + laugh at the end
- John Paul Jones - acoustic guitar
- John Bonham - drums
- Ian Stewart - piano
In addition : which guitar synth? I thought they were intotruced in 1977 (see: guitar synthesizer). The sound is of the mandolin, the acoustic guitar and the reverb. Saemikneu ( talk) 12:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Whether or not a particular song was "heavily influenced" by another is a matter of subjective opinion that can not be stated using Wikipedia's "voice". If the statement is to appear in the article, it must couched in language such as "Writing in his [NAME OF BOOK], {NAME OF PERSON] opined that the song was "heavily influenced" by ... ". That's what is meant by in-text attribution and that is what is needed here. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 23:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Considering the song was the subject of successful legal action, I'm not so sure that this is a subjective opinion as it is a legal argument with considerable merit. Nonetheless I'll ruin the continuity of the sentence to address your concerns — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.29.97.165 ( talk) 23:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boogie with Stu redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
If I recall correctly, Ian Stewart was present for this song because the band employed him also for "Rock and Roll" on IV. I'm not sure, so I'll let someone else add that to the article.
- Yes, indeed. Both were recorded between Dec 1970 and Feb1971. Other stuff: The acoustic guitar could also have been played by John Paul Jones. I really don't hear any bass guitar (verified trhough personal spectral anylysis) sound (just of the bass drum and acoustic guitar). So my personnel section would be:
- Robert Plant - vocals, handclaps + laugh at the end
- Jimmy Page - mandolin + laugh at the end
- John Paul Jones - acoustic guitar
- John Bonham - drums
- Ian Stewart - piano
In addition : which guitar synth? I thought they were intotruced in 1977 (see: guitar synthesizer). The sound is of the mandolin, the acoustic guitar and the reverb. Saemikneu ( talk) 12:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Whether or not a particular song was "heavily influenced" by another is a matter of subjective opinion that can not be stated using Wikipedia's "voice". If the statement is to appear in the article, it must couched in language such as "Writing in his [NAME OF BOOK], {NAME OF PERSON] opined that the song was "heavily influenced" by ... ". That's what is meant by in-text attribution and that is what is needed here. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 23:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Considering the song was the subject of successful legal action, I'm not so sure that this is a subjective opinion as it is a legal argument with considerable merit. Nonetheless I'll ruin the continuity of the sentence to address your concerns — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.29.97.165 ( talk) 23:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)