GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: TheMagikCow ( talk · contribs) 12:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a very good well written article. Somebody who knows nothing about Bitcoin get get a lot of information from this; technical language is kept to a minimum.
However, the only problem I have again is the occasional edit warring. We also seem to get a lot of good faith content that has to be reverted. The criteria specifies that it must be Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. My interpretation of this is that there should be no edit wars in the past month.
Verdict: I will put this on hold for ten days. If after that period there has been no edit wars I believe that it deserves GA status.
TheMagikCow (
talk) 12:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Note: It appears TheMagikCow has passed the article. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 23:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: TheMagikCow ( talk · contribs) 12:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a very good well written article. Somebody who knows nothing about Bitcoin get get a lot of information from this; technical language is kept to a minimum.
However, the only problem I have again is the occasional edit warring. We also seem to get a lot of good faith content that has to be reverted. The criteria specifies that it must be Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. My interpretation of this is that there should be no edit wars in the past month.
Verdict: I will put this on hold for ten days. If after that period there has been no edit wars I believe that it deserves GA status.
TheMagikCow (
talk) 12:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Note: It appears TheMagikCow has passed the article. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 23:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)