This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Biopharmaceutical: This list is incomplete, please discuss and add more.
|
|
|
Why don't we fusion this article with biopharmacology? -- Pepetps 18:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was: Not Moved. Closure as requested by nominator. Station1 ( talk) 08:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Biopharmaceutical → Biopharmaceutical drug — biopharmaceutical is an adjective and Wikipedia titles are nouns per WP:ADJECTIVE; cf Pharmaceutical which redirects to Pharmaceutical drug RexxS ( talk) 02:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I don't know if this is the right place to put this, but I would like to see something in the ethics section about population health implications and equity issues, as in the article at http://www.medicc.org/mediccreview/index.php?issue=17&id=204&a=va My apologies if this is in the wrong place. I am tech-clueless. Cranmills ( talk) 16:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)cranmills
It seems that there is a clear consensus not to move the page. Would any uninvolved editor close it as Not moved, please? Otherwise, I'll close it myself if there are no objections. -- RexxS ( talk) 02:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
today i merged this article into Biologic medical product as it almost completely overlapped and the target article was not so long that it needed a split. In general the "drug" articles are too scattered and lack interconnection. working on fixing that. Jytdog ( talk) 21:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Article merged: See old talk-page here.
The contents of the Biopharmacology page were merged into Biopharmaceutical on 28 August 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Please see Biologics for immunosuppression.
I struggled with the term "biologics" because it is an ambiguous world with multiple meanings. I redirected biologics from this article to that one.
I started a discussion about terminology on the talk page of that article. Before I meddle with this article I thought that I would let that other article sit for a while, because I have doubts about how to separate the concept of "biopharmaceutical" as something distinct from "biologics". Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Biopharmaceutical: This list is incomplete, please discuss and add more.
|
|
|
Why don't we fusion this article with biopharmacology? -- Pepetps 18:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was: Not Moved. Closure as requested by nominator. Station1 ( talk) 08:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Biopharmaceutical → Biopharmaceutical drug — biopharmaceutical is an adjective and Wikipedia titles are nouns per WP:ADJECTIVE; cf Pharmaceutical which redirects to Pharmaceutical drug RexxS ( talk) 02:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I don't know if this is the right place to put this, but I would like to see something in the ethics section about population health implications and equity issues, as in the article at http://www.medicc.org/mediccreview/index.php?issue=17&id=204&a=va My apologies if this is in the wrong place. I am tech-clueless. Cranmills ( talk) 16:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)cranmills
It seems that there is a clear consensus not to move the page. Would any uninvolved editor close it as Not moved, please? Otherwise, I'll close it myself if there are no objections. -- RexxS ( talk) 02:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
today i merged this article into Biologic medical product as it almost completely overlapped and the target article was not so long that it needed a split. In general the "drug" articles are too scattered and lack interconnection. working on fixing that. Jytdog ( talk) 21:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Article merged: See old talk-page here.
The contents of the Biopharmacology page were merged into Biopharmaceutical on 28 August 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Please see Biologics for immunosuppression.
I struggled with the term "biologics" because it is an ambiguous world with multiple meanings. I redirected biologics from this article to that one.
I started a discussion about terminology on the talk page of that article. Before I meddle with this article I thought that I would let that other article sit for a while, because I have doubts about how to separate the concept of "biopharmaceutical" as something distinct from "biologics". Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)