This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 9 December 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Heat death of the universe Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Heat death of the universe |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the Big Freeze discussion page! Feel free to post and start new topics, I could use some opinions!
I worked pretty hard to write it, but it's open to edits to improve it. I would just like your opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GalaxyGirl ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
I think that this article needs to be cleaned up a bit, and needs to mention the differences between the Big Freeze and the similar but different Heat Death fate of the universe. Deathsushi 19:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I liked the the almost satrical qualities of the article, especially the line "the Universe would not die, just be very cold". Love it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gruntyking117 ( talk • contribs) 03:53, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
seriously, this page feels empty. needs more facts and stuff like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.212.134.41 ( talk • contribs) 05:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
(Cross-posted from Heat death of the universe)
As far as I can understand (and as suggested here), heat death means a flat universe dying from max entropy, and the Big Freeze is an open (constantly expanding) universe dying from expansion causing heat to be spread out - the effects are the same, but the causes different. I've updated the article a little accordingly and linked to that page, but it would be useful if someone could check that this is correct and if so explain it a bit more clearly than I've done :) -- Jomel 16:17, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Is it just me, or is it not entirely necessary to mention at least three times that the universe needs to be flat or hyperbolic? Repetition is good, but for an article this small, repeating something at least 3 times is over kill. User:Btg2290 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.237.88 ( talk • contribs) 00:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
the descriptions of kind of misleading—ESPECIALLY the last one which states literally that the universe is two dimensional, like a piece of paper. We should at least change that one. I think the article Shape of the Universe has good examples of descriptions of universe geometries. Ewthmatth 14:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Big Freeze. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 9#Big Freeze until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- 67.70.26.89 ( talk) 11:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 9 December 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Heat death of the universe Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Heat death of the universe |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the Big Freeze discussion page! Feel free to post and start new topics, I could use some opinions!
I worked pretty hard to write it, but it's open to edits to improve it. I would just like your opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GalaxyGirl ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
I think that this article needs to be cleaned up a bit, and needs to mention the differences between the Big Freeze and the similar but different Heat Death fate of the universe. Deathsushi 19:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I liked the the almost satrical qualities of the article, especially the line "the Universe would not die, just be very cold". Love it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gruntyking117 ( talk • contribs) 03:53, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
seriously, this page feels empty. needs more facts and stuff like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.212.134.41 ( talk • contribs) 05:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
(Cross-posted from Heat death of the universe)
As far as I can understand (and as suggested here), heat death means a flat universe dying from max entropy, and the Big Freeze is an open (constantly expanding) universe dying from expansion causing heat to be spread out - the effects are the same, but the causes different. I've updated the article a little accordingly and linked to that page, but it would be useful if someone could check that this is correct and if so explain it a bit more clearly than I've done :) -- Jomel 16:17, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Is it just me, or is it not entirely necessary to mention at least three times that the universe needs to be flat or hyperbolic? Repetition is good, but for an article this small, repeating something at least 3 times is over kill. User:Btg2290 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.237.88 ( talk • contribs) 00:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
the descriptions of kind of misleading—ESPECIALLY the last one which states literally that the universe is two dimensional, like a piece of paper. We should at least change that one. I think the article Shape of the Universe has good examples of descriptions of universe geometries. Ewthmatth 14:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Big Freeze. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 9#Big Freeze until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- 67.70.26.89 ( talk) 11:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)