This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Worcestershire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Bewdley article states (and I've heard the same) that the bridge is the only unmodernised Telford bridge still carrying motor traffic. Is this true, and if so is there a reference anywhere? Loganberry ( Talk) 00:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I deliberately didn't add that here as I have found no source to back it up. I'd be very, very surprised if it were true, as Telford built dozens if not hundreds of bridges, and I reckon it wouldn't be too hard to find another that was unmodified and still carried traffic. -- Kvetner 12:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I think I'm going to take it out of the Bewdley article. I live in Bewdley, and have heard this mentioned by locals, but I can't recall hearing a precise definition of "unmodified". As such it's really got to count as unreferenced speculation, and therefore shouldn't be in. Loganberry ( Talk) 13:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bewdley Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927002945/http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/home/wccindex/wcc-records/wcc-records-pic-8.htm to http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/home/wccindex/wcc-records/wcc-records-pic-8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bewdley Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710193837/http://www.engineering-timelines.com/scripts/engineeringItem.asp?id=317 to http://www.engineering-timelines.com/scripts/engineeringItem.asp?id=317

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply