From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellman. Biografin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun ( talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC) reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • Sorry for the delay in reviewing, was caught up in some irl stuff.
    • No worries!
  • Swedish phrases should be in lang templates.
    • Done.
  • "is the central" → Shouldn't it be "a", or is Bellman truly the most central figure in Swedish songs?
    • He is.
  • The paragraph describing Fredman's Songs could be merged into the one about Fredman's Epistles.
    • Done.
  • "a Dramatis personae" → "dramatis" should be lowercase, I think.
    • Done.
  • Link Bacchanalian.
    • Done.
  • Link Swedish Book Review in the text.
    • Done.
  • "life - for" → Should be a spaced en-dash, perhaps?
    • Done.
  • Spot-checks on '"Review: Bellman. Biografin (Bellman. The Biography)". Swedish Book Review. 2021 (2).' found that it supported the claims made.
    • Noted.
  • Assuming good faith on the rest of the sources, which are in Swedish, but look to be reliable.
    • Noted.
  • Images are all correctly licensed and appropriately used.
    • Noted.
  • Overall a very good article. AryKun ( talk) 16:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Passes all criteria now, so will be passing. AryKun ( talk) 13:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellman. Biografin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun ( talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC) reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • Sorry for the delay in reviewing, was caught up in some irl stuff.
    • No worries!
  • Swedish phrases should be in lang templates.
    • Done.
  • "is the central" → Shouldn't it be "a", or is Bellman truly the most central figure in Swedish songs?
    • He is.
  • The paragraph describing Fredman's Songs could be merged into the one about Fredman's Epistles.
    • Done.
  • "a Dramatis personae" → "dramatis" should be lowercase, I think.
    • Done.
  • Link Bacchanalian.
    • Done.
  • Link Swedish Book Review in the text.
    • Done.
  • "life - for" → Should be a spaced en-dash, perhaps?
    • Done.
  • Spot-checks on '"Review: Bellman. Biografin (Bellman. The Biography)". Swedish Book Review. 2021 (2).' found that it supported the claims made.
    • Noted.
  • Assuming good faith on the rest of the sources, which are in Swedish, but look to be reliable.
    • Noted.
  • Images are all correctly licensed and appropriately used.
    • Noted.
  • Overall a very good article. AryKun ( talk) 16:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Passes all criteria now, so will be passing. AryKun ( talk) 13:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook