This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 August 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! new episode is "The Love God", Daphne feet wiggling his toes, He announced in SDCC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B41C:1AAF:AD1F:AC4B:5FDD:523C ( talk) 19:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.199.82.112 ( talk)
In this edit I boldly swapped the Cast list to a Character list. In my extensive experience, cast lists for animated series tend to invite all sorts of crufty additions like "Prisoner #1", etc. We should only be focusing on significant recurring roles. I've brought the character list into conformity with MOS:TV, however, it's unclear of the many names in the Recurring characters section who is a recurring character, or who is a one-time character. It would be helpful if people familiar with the series would please remove the characters that have not appeared in more than one episodes. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
There's been some issues lately on how we should handle this episode, since it was released on iTunes and Amazon but then removed within a day. For those familiar with the show, should we list "Scary Christmas" as episode 14 since it aired on TV first, or leave it as it is? Katniss ♥ 03:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
"Eating Crow" didn't air on March 19, 2016 and apparently for some people they can't accept this, and they also apparently can't accept that fact that we can't copy descriptions from TV Guide. All the constant undoing isn't going to stop the inevitable next undoing that me or someone else with a brain will have to do. I've seen this being done on other talk pages, so I hope I don't get a "Yeah, but no" answer. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 11:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
The comma needs to be put back in. It's not in the title card, but it's necessary for grammar. It's not that big of a change. It's not like adding a completely new word. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 20:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
We have two problems here: 1) Yes, the move should be discussed. While the title card does not have the comma, many of the sources cited, including some of the quasi-official ones, do include the comma. 2) If the consensus is to move this, the article needs to be moved -- not copied from one location to another and blanked at the old location. As the proposed new title exists as a redirect, this would require admin action to delete the redirect at the new location. To correct begin correcting this, I am requesting admin intervention to correct the bad move. (As there have been edits to both the article and the talk page, I cannot simply "undo" the bad edits.) Next, we need some discussion here as to which title we should use. - SummerPhD v2.0 20:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
It seems we need to undo a copy-paste move and partially merge the histories due to intervening edits (then discuss the proposed move). I could be wrong, having never studied mopology. You, dear admin, however, are likely an expert on such matters. In addition to respecting your call on this pressing matter, I can only offer my sincerest thanks. "Why all the kowtowing, Dox?" Glad you asked. I currently have two, count 'em: two,admin help requests up. I feel needy. - SummerPhD v2.0 20:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Back to the question: We have a mixture here. Reliable sources go both ways. Additionally, we have the title card without and quasi-official sources with. Finally, though hardly the arbiter in such cases, grammar would call for a comma before a noun of direct address. - SummerPhD v2.0 17:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
It seems there's contradiction in following a reliable source with Zap2it and TV Guide. They've been reliable with names (mostly) and descriptions, but not air dates (and now season designation), which has been getting worse and worse. The reality is, there was 26 episodes for season 1, and then 26 episodes for season 2, as is the regular order these days (as it was for Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated). We shouldn't uphold to something that Zap2it and TV Guide have been clearly misdirected with, and won't bother to correct themselves on it. And since it won't be airing on US television anymore, what they say is irrelevant. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 16:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
The introduction is far too long. Most of that could be put into the production section. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 09:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and made a WP:BOLD to the first season episode list and deleted all mentions of the Boomerang SVOD service premieres. It seems unnecessary to mention, particularly since the episodes premiered a month before on the actual Boomerang network, so thus it isn't a "world premiere." In my opinion, the same WP:NOTTVGUIDE policies we have regarding repeats would apply for this, since the episodes were made available (albeit at a very inconvenient time of 2 a.m. eastern) previous to their release on the Boomerang streaming service. If anyone has thoughts or concerns on this I'm happy to discuss the inclusion (or exclusion) of this content further. Regards, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 22:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
According to this article Be Cool will continue to premiere new episodes throughout 2018. But if it's already aired, how is this true?-- Harmony944 ( talk) 15:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Aren't we gonna add the reception of how people thought of the show's concept? -- XSMan2016 ( talk) 02:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Copy":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
I was curious about why the show was cancelled, and did some digging and came across a couple of reddit posts and forums about why the show was cancelled, and it sounds pretty serious from the perspective of the creators of the show, whose work was being constantly interfered with by WB, and weren't even credited as series co-creators or producers. I was wondering if it was worth adding a section about this? Here are the links:
Drama https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/6jekz1/creator_of_be_cool_scooby_doo_comments_on_the/
Ratings info https://www.reddit.com/r/Scoobydoo/comments/8erxsg/do_we_know_why_be_cool_scooby_doo_has_been/
Original Creator's forum post
https://scoobyaddicts.proboards.com/thread/4595/official-return-boomerang-streaming-service?page=4 Suushathet ( talk) 08:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 August 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! new episode is "The Love God", Daphne feet wiggling his toes, He announced in SDCC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B41C:1AAF:AD1F:AC4B:5FDD:523C ( talk) 19:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.199.82.112 ( talk)
In this edit I boldly swapped the Cast list to a Character list. In my extensive experience, cast lists for animated series tend to invite all sorts of crufty additions like "Prisoner #1", etc. We should only be focusing on significant recurring roles. I've brought the character list into conformity with MOS:TV, however, it's unclear of the many names in the Recurring characters section who is a recurring character, or who is a one-time character. It would be helpful if people familiar with the series would please remove the characters that have not appeared in more than one episodes. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
There's been some issues lately on how we should handle this episode, since it was released on iTunes and Amazon but then removed within a day. For those familiar with the show, should we list "Scary Christmas" as episode 14 since it aired on TV first, or leave it as it is? Katniss ♥ 03:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
"Eating Crow" didn't air on March 19, 2016 and apparently for some people they can't accept this, and they also apparently can't accept that fact that we can't copy descriptions from TV Guide. All the constant undoing isn't going to stop the inevitable next undoing that me or someone else with a brain will have to do. I've seen this being done on other talk pages, so I hope I don't get a "Yeah, but no" answer. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 11:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
The comma needs to be put back in. It's not in the title card, but it's necessary for grammar. It's not that big of a change. It's not like adding a completely new word. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 20:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
We have two problems here: 1) Yes, the move should be discussed. While the title card does not have the comma, many of the sources cited, including some of the quasi-official ones, do include the comma. 2) If the consensus is to move this, the article needs to be moved -- not copied from one location to another and blanked at the old location. As the proposed new title exists as a redirect, this would require admin action to delete the redirect at the new location. To correct begin correcting this, I am requesting admin intervention to correct the bad move. (As there have been edits to both the article and the talk page, I cannot simply "undo" the bad edits.) Next, we need some discussion here as to which title we should use. - SummerPhD v2.0 20:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
It seems we need to undo a copy-paste move and partially merge the histories due to intervening edits (then discuss the proposed move). I could be wrong, having never studied mopology. You, dear admin, however, are likely an expert on such matters. In addition to respecting your call on this pressing matter, I can only offer my sincerest thanks. "Why all the kowtowing, Dox?" Glad you asked. I currently have two, count 'em: two,admin help requests up. I feel needy. - SummerPhD v2.0 20:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Back to the question: We have a mixture here. Reliable sources go both ways. Additionally, we have the title card without and quasi-official sources with. Finally, though hardly the arbiter in such cases, grammar would call for a comma before a noun of direct address. - SummerPhD v2.0 17:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
It seems there's contradiction in following a reliable source with Zap2it and TV Guide. They've been reliable with names (mostly) and descriptions, but not air dates (and now season designation), which has been getting worse and worse. The reality is, there was 26 episodes for season 1, and then 26 episodes for season 2, as is the regular order these days (as it was for Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated). We shouldn't uphold to something that Zap2it and TV Guide have been clearly misdirected with, and won't bother to correct themselves on it. And since it won't be airing on US television anymore, what they say is irrelevant. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 16:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
The introduction is far too long. Most of that could be put into the production section. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 09:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and made a WP:BOLD to the first season episode list and deleted all mentions of the Boomerang SVOD service premieres. It seems unnecessary to mention, particularly since the episodes premiered a month before on the actual Boomerang network, so thus it isn't a "world premiere." In my opinion, the same WP:NOTTVGUIDE policies we have regarding repeats would apply for this, since the episodes were made available (albeit at a very inconvenient time of 2 a.m. eastern) previous to their release on the Boomerang streaming service. If anyone has thoughts or concerns on this I'm happy to discuss the inclusion (or exclusion) of this content further. Regards, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 22:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
According to this article Be Cool will continue to premiere new episodes throughout 2018. But if it's already aired, how is this true?-- Harmony944 ( talk) 15:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Aren't we gonna add the reception of how people thought of the show's concept? -- XSMan2016 ( talk) 02:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Copy":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
I was curious about why the show was cancelled, and did some digging and came across a couple of reddit posts and forums about why the show was cancelled, and it sounds pretty serious from the perspective of the creators of the show, whose work was being constantly interfered with by WB, and weren't even credited as series co-creators or producers. I was wondering if it was worth adding a section about this? Here are the links:
Drama https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/6jekz1/creator_of_be_cool_scooby_doo_comments_on_the/
Ratings info https://www.reddit.com/r/Scoobydoo/comments/8erxsg/do_we_know_why_be_cool_scooby_doo_has_been/
Original Creator's forum post
https://scoobyaddicts.proboards.com/thread/4595/official-return-boomerang-streaming-service?page=4 Suushathet ( talk) 08:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)