This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Regarding the constant change lately of the outcome section of the infobox:
The long-ish standing battle outcome stated in the
infobox of this article, "decisive victory," has ample evidence to call it such. The Republicans lost 93% of their force, the few survivors were unable to regroup or become a viable force afterward, and some didn't stop running until they reached Louisiana. Also, the word "decisive" is certainly not required to be used in and of itself in any reference used. Words in sources such as "soundly" or "overwhelmingly" serve the same purpose. Per
BLUE, the battle was a decisive victory.
GenQuest"Talk to Me" 16:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Regarding the constant change lately of the outcome section of the infobox:
The long-ish standing battle outcome stated in the
infobox of this article, "decisive victory," has ample evidence to call it such. The Republicans lost 93% of their force, the few survivors were unable to regroup or become a viable force afterward, and some didn't stop running until they reached Louisiana. Also, the word "decisive" is certainly not required to be used in and of itself in any reference used. Words in sources such as "soundly" or "overwhelmingly" serve the same purpose. Per
BLUE, the battle was a decisive victory.
GenQuest"Talk to Me" 16:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)reply