This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Baku bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics:
~~~~ ARTICLE'S PROJECT ~~~~ |||||||||||||||||||||||| | :> - Section | | ::> - Sub-section | | :::> - Paragraph | |||||||||||||||||||||||| ------------------ [TABLE] INFOBOX ✓ ------------------ ::> Introduction ✗ (Four paragraphs, each containing:) :::> General/Election information ✗ :::> Process/Failure information ✗ :> == Candidature process == ✗ (A right-aligned picture and three paragraphs, each containing:) :::> Postulant city information ✗ :::> Applicant city information ✗ :::> Evaluation information ✗ ------------------ [TABLE] EVALUATION ✗ ------------------ :> == Candidature concept == ✗ (A right-aligned picture and three paragraphs, each containing:) :::> Overall concept and vision/Visual ident ✗ :::> Politics/Controversies ✗ :::> Expierence and Dates ✗ :> == Candidature project == ✗ (A right-aligned picture and four paragraphs, each containing:) :::> Overall project/Venues ✗ :::> Infrastructure ✗ :::> Paralympics/Finance ✗ :> == References == ✗ (Containing {{Reflist}} with all references using the {{Citation}} mechanism.) :> == External links == ✗ (Containing official sources, templates, categories and interwikis.) |
Wonderful. An editor puts a Neutrality tag on a page, claiming the article is "press releasy" but makes no further comments for improvement. The page is clearly cited and linked to articles. Positives and negatives to the bid are mentioned. What would the editor like to add or change? If no response, I will remove the tag in a week's time.-- Cbradshaw ( talk) 04:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the article's second graf:
Had Baku been chosen to host, the games were to be held between July 15 and July 31, 2016.[1] The Paralympics would have been held between August 10 and August 22.
Isn't this irrelevant now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.182.172.229 ( talk) 17:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Baku bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Baku bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics:
~~~~ ARTICLE'S PROJECT ~~~~ |||||||||||||||||||||||| | :> - Section | | ::> - Sub-section | | :::> - Paragraph | |||||||||||||||||||||||| ------------------ [TABLE] INFOBOX ✓ ------------------ ::> Introduction ✗ (Four paragraphs, each containing:) :::> General/Election information ✗ :::> Process/Failure information ✗ :> == Candidature process == ✗ (A right-aligned picture and three paragraphs, each containing:) :::> Postulant city information ✗ :::> Applicant city information ✗ :::> Evaluation information ✗ ------------------ [TABLE] EVALUATION ✗ ------------------ :> == Candidature concept == ✗ (A right-aligned picture and three paragraphs, each containing:) :::> Overall concept and vision/Visual ident ✗ :::> Politics/Controversies ✗ :::> Expierence and Dates ✗ :> == Candidature project == ✗ (A right-aligned picture and four paragraphs, each containing:) :::> Overall project/Venues ✗ :::> Infrastructure ✗ :::> Paralympics/Finance ✗ :> == References == ✗ (Containing {{Reflist}} with all references using the {{Citation}} mechanism.) :> == External links == ✗ (Containing official sources, templates, categories and interwikis.) |
Wonderful. An editor puts a Neutrality tag on a page, claiming the article is "press releasy" but makes no further comments for improvement. The page is clearly cited and linked to articles. Positives and negatives to the bid are mentioned. What would the editor like to add or change? If no response, I will remove the tag in a week's time.-- Cbradshaw ( talk) 04:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the article's second graf:
Had Baku been chosen to host, the games were to be held between July 15 and July 31, 2016.[1] The Paralympics would have been held between August 10 and August 22.
Isn't this irrelevant now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.182.172.229 ( talk) 17:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Baku bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)