This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC ( See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. ( See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Radio Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Radio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary) Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane Maintain : Portal:Radio Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs Verify : Unreferenced BLPs Other : Collaboration of the Week: Requests for Radio peer review: Rod Serling The Howard Stern Show The History of Rock & Roll American Top 40; The Museum of Curiosity; Scott Mills (radio show) Lincolnshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Stamford ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stamford, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StamfordWikipedia:WikiProject StamfordTemplate:WikiProject StamfordStamford articles

Keeps editing this page? I've been keeping it as updated as possible for I don't know how long, and someone keeps editing everything.

If there is anything to know about the station, I know it....

What is the point if someone else overwrites all the accuracies?

Why has it been reverted to a version that is full of innacuracies?!! It doesn't make sense!! -- Differentgravy 14:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply

With so many RAF stations in the county, and historical airfields, there is no recognition of this in the station's programming.

Does anyone know what this is about? How do you recognise airfields in the station's programming? An hour of jet engine noises? -- Throup ( talk) 00:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Yeah, I'll delete it. -- Differentgravy 22:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply

This para is particularly bad, on many levels:

"Only north of Lincoln is the FM frequency reasonably clear. Sadly, however, the good folk of the affluent Northern Lincoln Fringe villages rarely tune in to it because whilst the signal quality is good, the quality of the programming rarely matches the signal."

• "Only north of Lincoln": no, it's fine across huge areas of the county. Lincoln-centric statement.
• "Sadly": pov.
• "affluent Northern Lincoln Fringe villages": what?
• "programming rarely matches the signal": non-encylopedic.

That said, I think that some of the reverts have been rather reactionary. Is there no room for compromise - to describe the occasionally rather parochial content non-pejoratively and in context? TheVenerableBede 07:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I think in respect of most of your points you're referring to the vandalised page - it's now been updated and locked. As for 'rather parochial content' - that is a point of view in itself (therefore the argument over in context and non-pejoratively is invalid), not a fact, so shouldn't exist. However, there should be some additions made to the presenter list, and some of the 'programming' section is out of date - can I suggest a return to this version? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=BBC_Radio_Lincolnshire&oldid=62643077 User:Jameswick 23.34 20 July 2006

Absolutely. I just don't think that the content that keeps getting reverted is vandalism, per se, just bady expressed and bullishly asserted. The variation in signal quality in different areas of the county, the demographic of the listernership ("Affluent fringe" et al.(!)), and the nature, scope, and yes, quality of the programming should all be discussed in a radio station article ... just not like this. TheVenerableBede 08:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Alot of things in that article are factually inaccurate, plus, "News reader gaffs" are not encycopaedic. I locked the page due to the heavy amount of vandalism/unneeded reverts. -- Differentgravy 20:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply

It looks like someone is repeatedly vandalising this article. Please stop. Lee Stanley 21:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC) reply

It's been ages since BBC Radio Lincolnshire was rebranded as BBC Lincolnshire. Why has it therefore been renamed from BBC Lincolnshire to BBC Radio Lincolnshire? I request the recent renaming (and the consequent overwriting of the redirect at BBC Radio Lincolnshire be undone.— GrahamSmith ( talk) 02:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The station's website is indeed headed "BBC Lincolnshire". However, the station consistently refers to itself on air as "BBC Radio Lincolnshire". -- Picapica ( talk) 20:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on BBC Radio Lincolnshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090101174629/http://www.maximumproduction.co.uk/ to http://www.maximumproduction.co.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228170410/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2007/10/nr_20071024 to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2007/10/nr_20071024
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228012407/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radio/ifi/rbl/dcr/applications/lincolnshire/ to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radio/ifi/rbl/dcr/applications/lincolnshire/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080304054239/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/02/nr_20080219b to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/02/nr_20080219b

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC) reply