| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Autorefractor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
I would like to see Automated refractor redirect to Autorefractor as it is the more common term. As of today:
- "autorefractor" gets 32,600 Google hits,
- "auto-refractor" gets 20,700 Google hits,
- "autorefraction" gets 17,400 Google hits,
- "automated refraction" gets 1,750 Google hits
- "auto-refraction" gets 974 Google hits, and
- "automated refractor" gets 897 Google hits
Even with the Wikipedia article, "automated refractor" gets only a minority of the relevant hits. - AED 23:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The picture moves in and out of focus and the machine takes readings to determine when the image is on the retina.
How does the machine know when the image is in focus for my individual eye? Can it look at the retina reflection of the image shown and see when the image is sharp? If it works so, the light has to go back through my eye lens system again, changing the optical properties of the image a second time. How can the machine handle this then? -- Abdull 10:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Check out this link for an explanation of how auto-refractors work. - AED 06:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
This text was added to the page itself. I am moving it to the talk page since it clearly does not belong in the article, but the content may be useful for improving the article.
Determining the "refractive error" is not the same as "prescribing" eyeglasses via a "prescription": it's sort of like the apples-and-oranges analogy. While automated equipment to help determine refractive error is certainly an aid in the chain of events leading to a written prescrscription, it is only that - an aid. Furthermore, it takes experience to understand the limitations of this automated process. If a sight tester were to use the results of just an automated refraction system to make up eyeglasses there would be (in my experience as an Optometrist) many eyeglasses which would be inappropriate for the vision requirments of the patient; as well, I have found that too amny of these automated prescriptions result in eyesrain, if not constantly, then with certain vision tasks. There is no automated equipment that can replace the experience and integrity of a professional eyecare practionioner.
Paul Wootten, O.D.
Josh Thompson 01:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
In Uses section: "Here, lenses are switched in and out of a phoropter and the patient is asked "which looks better" while looking at a chart. This feedback refines the prescription to one which provides the patient with the best vision." It is unclear what this has to do with auto-refactors. What is "Here" referring to? CrocodilesAreForWimps ( talk) 18:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Autorefractor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141222180646/http://www.optometry.co.uk:80/uploads/articles/ae331f5e9f3c12ab8e23e345f22b45d4_dave20040604.pdf to http://www.optometry.co.uk/uploads/articles/ae331f5e9f3c12ab8e23e345f22b45d4_dave20040604.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222105214/http://pikeophthalmic.com/ to http://pikeophthalmic.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Autorefractor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
I would like to see Automated refractor redirect to Autorefractor as it is the more common term. As of today:
- "autorefractor" gets 32,600 Google hits,
- "auto-refractor" gets 20,700 Google hits,
- "autorefraction" gets 17,400 Google hits,
- "automated refraction" gets 1,750 Google hits
- "auto-refraction" gets 974 Google hits, and
- "automated refractor" gets 897 Google hits
Even with the Wikipedia article, "automated refractor" gets only a minority of the relevant hits. - AED 23:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The picture moves in and out of focus and the machine takes readings to determine when the image is on the retina.
How does the machine know when the image is in focus for my individual eye? Can it look at the retina reflection of the image shown and see when the image is sharp? If it works so, the light has to go back through my eye lens system again, changing the optical properties of the image a second time. How can the machine handle this then? -- Abdull 10:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Check out this link for an explanation of how auto-refractors work. - AED 06:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
This text was added to the page itself. I am moving it to the talk page since it clearly does not belong in the article, but the content may be useful for improving the article.
Determining the "refractive error" is not the same as "prescribing" eyeglasses via a "prescription": it's sort of like the apples-and-oranges analogy. While automated equipment to help determine refractive error is certainly an aid in the chain of events leading to a written prescrscription, it is only that - an aid. Furthermore, it takes experience to understand the limitations of this automated process. If a sight tester were to use the results of just an automated refraction system to make up eyeglasses there would be (in my experience as an Optometrist) many eyeglasses which would be inappropriate for the vision requirments of the patient; as well, I have found that too amny of these automated prescriptions result in eyesrain, if not constantly, then with certain vision tasks. There is no automated equipment that can replace the experience and integrity of a professional eyecare practionioner.
Paul Wootten, O.D.
Josh Thompson 01:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
In Uses section: "Here, lenses are switched in and out of a phoropter and the patient is asked "which looks better" while looking at a chart. This feedback refines the prescription to one which provides the patient with the best vision." It is unclear what this has to do with auto-refactors. What is "Here" referring to? CrocodilesAreForWimps ( talk) 18:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Autorefractor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141222180646/http://www.optometry.co.uk:80/uploads/articles/ae331f5e9f3c12ab8e23e345f22b45d4_dave20040604.pdf to http://www.optometry.co.uk/uploads/articles/ae331f5e9f3c12ab8e23e345f22b45d4_dave20040604.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222105214/http://pikeophthalmic.com/ to http://pikeophthalmic.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)