This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Derbyshire Low‑importance The article on Ault Hucknall is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. More information: /  At least one photograph is included in this article This article needs statistical information to be added

A Parish Church qualifies a small community as a village over a hamlet. (unknown contributor but entirely correct)

Although the village might be small, the parish taking its name from it covers a larger area. Hardwick Hall is in the ecclesiastical parish (see this webpage), as are several other hamlets. The article plays down the importance locally of Ault Hucknall. Someone better qualified than I should get this article right! Peter Shearan 06:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC) reply