This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Literature / Logic Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Logic Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles This article has been marked as needing an infobox. It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

I have a paperback copy of this book, however I noticed that there is an extra criterion ("structurally well-formed"). I must have an edition previous to #5. [1] indicates that the 5th edition is where this new criterion appears. -- Glork2718 16:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply

The first paragraph says: "Attacking Faulty Reasoning is a textbook on logical fallacies by T. Edward Damer that has been used for many years in a number of college courses on logic, critical thinking, argumentation, and philosophy". Is there a way to prove this? Enisbayramoglu ( talk) 11:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply