This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
On 23 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be
moved to
Assize. The result of
the discussion was not moved.
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move to
Assizes.
Jeremy (
talk) 22:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Assizes (England and Wales) →
Assizes — The majority of the incoming links at
Assizes refer to the periodic criminal courts held around England and Wales until 1972.
Assizes also currently redirects here. This article should therefore be recognized as the primary target for the term "Assizes" and the disambiguator "(England and Wales)" should be removed.
Neelix (
talk) 16:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose there are current courts in mainland Europe still going by this name, whereas this court does not exist anymore.
76.66.202.72 (
talk) 03:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment the disambiguation page should be restored to "Assiszes", where it was situated until mid-2009.
76.66.202.72 (
talk) 03:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Note the redirect Assize should point to the dab page.
76.66.202.72 (
talk) 03:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator - There are no current courts that are called "Assizes"; the three current courts with similar names are not referred to as "Assizes". The court in Belgium is called the "Court of Assize", the courts in France are called "Cour d'assises", and the court in Italy is called "Corte d'Assise". The possibility that a user might confuse the Assizes with these other courts is what justifies the disambiguation page; it does not negate the former courts of England and Wales as the primary target for the term "Assizes".
Neelix (
talk) 13:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Support, I agree this is the primary meaning of "Assizes", the other courts would be referred to (if at all) by other names.--
Kotniski (
talk) 12:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - never sure why it was moved in the first place.
S a g a C i t y (
talk) 12:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Kellyhi! 03:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Wales please
What went on in Wales until the Wales Circuit - please add a concise summary to the article from a relevant county history work or legal history text.-
Adam37Talk 14:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Already answered by another section. Hatnote duly created.-
Adam37Talk 14:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Requested move 23 April 2024
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I think this might benefit from a discussion, just to be on the safe size. It's almost always referred to in the plural, so could be an exception to WP:SINGULAR. —
Amakuru (
talk) 09:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I have no objection to discussion if that is the case, but the first instance I saw was
Assize of Clarendon, which then brought me to the general topic. —
Ost (
talk) 16:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The plural "assizes" is commonly used for the courts as an institution and preferable for this article. The singular "assize" has a wider meaning, e.g. used for any individual session, or to refer to any jury or board generally speaking, e.g. the assize of measures, bread, ale, etc. Essentially, anything that involves raising any sort of local community board or jury is an "assize". Moreover, there is danger of confusing it with a legal instrument commonly referred to as "assize", that is a writ for the recovery of immoveable property (called an "assize" precisely because to execute the writ, the sheriff has to summon a local jury).
Walrasiad (
talk) 12:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Almost always seen in the plural. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 15:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
On 23 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be
moved to
Assize. The result of
the discussion was not moved.
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move to
Assizes.
Jeremy (
talk) 22:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Assizes (England and Wales) →
Assizes — The majority of the incoming links at
Assizes refer to the periodic criminal courts held around England and Wales until 1972.
Assizes also currently redirects here. This article should therefore be recognized as the primary target for the term "Assizes" and the disambiguator "(England and Wales)" should be removed.
Neelix (
talk) 16:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose there are current courts in mainland Europe still going by this name, whereas this court does not exist anymore.
76.66.202.72 (
talk) 03:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment the disambiguation page should be restored to "Assiszes", where it was situated until mid-2009.
76.66.202.72 (
talk) 03:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Note the redirect Assize should point to the dab page.
76.66.202.72 (
talk) 03:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator - There are no current courts that are called "Assizes"; the three current courts with similar names are not referred to as "Assizes". The court in Belgium is called the "Court of Assize", the courts in France are called "Cour d'assises", and the court in Italy is called "Corte d'Assise". The possibility that a user might confuse the Assizes with these other courts is what justifies the disambiguation page; it does not negate the former courts of England and Wales as the primary target for the term "Assizes".
Neelix (
talk) 13:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Support, I agree this is the primary meaning of "Assizes", the other courts would be referred to (if at all) by other names.--
Kotniski (
talk) 12:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - never sure why it was moved in the first place.
S a g a C i t y (
talk) 12:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Kellyhi! 03:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Wales please
What went on in Wales until the Wales Circuit - please add a concise summary to the article from a relevant county history work or legal history text.-
Adam37Talk 14:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Already answered by another section. Hatnote duly created.-
Adam37Talk 14:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Requested move 23 April 2024
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I think this might benefit from a discussion, just to be on the safe size. It's almost always referred to in the plural, so could be an exception to WP:SINGULAR. —
Amakuru (
talk) 09:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I have no objection to discussion if that is the case, but the first instance I saw was
Assize of Clarendon, which then brought me to the general topic. —
Ost (
talk) 16:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The plural "assizes" is commonly used for the courts as an institution and preferable for this article. The singular "assize" has a wider meaning, e.g. used for any individual session, or to refer to any jury or board generally speaking, e.g. the assize of measures, bread, ale, etc. Essentially, anything that involves raising any sort of local community board or jury is an "assize". Moreover, there is danger of confusing it with a legal instrument commonly referred to as "assize", that is a writ for the recovery of immoveable property (called an "assize" precisely because to execute the writ, the sheriff has to summon a local jury).
Walrasiad (
talk) 12:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Almost always seen in the plural. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 15:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.