This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles England This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Sussex This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles

This is an example of the dozens of unnecessary stubs: there is a perfectly good article on Ashdown Forest itself, and this should be included in it. See this set of instructions about writing about geographical settlements Peter Shearan ( talk) 11:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC) reply

The Llama Park only relation to the Ashdown Forest is the location - it is a tourist centre, museum and location in its own right. Bit like including London Zoo in the article for London! MilborneOne ( talk) 11:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Merge. This seems to be no more than an advert for a non-notable minor tourist attraction. There are no secondary sources that I can find. I propose merging it with Ashdown Forest.-- Charles ( talk) 07:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC) reply

I support Merge. It is a minor tourist attraction (which was recently put up for sale, so there's also a question mark about its future). Only minor changes - if indeed any - would require to be made to the existing text about it in the Ashdown Forest article to cover it adequately. Dartford Warbler ( talk) 15:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC) reply