This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality. Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article quickly goes off on a tangent giving its author's opinion on a verse of the Bible. I can't understand what this has to do with the book this article is about. Are you trying to make the point that the author was wrong to use that title? I think that is well beyond the scope of this article and, worse, no one cares about your opinion on it.

Then the article goes on to quote some song lyrics loosely based on the book. Is this article about "As a Man Thinketh" or things people have written loosely about "As a Man Thinketh"?

Do you think we can get more content in this article about the book's content?

75.20.191.3 ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Randalljr, do you think you could help establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY? Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 18:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC) reply

To be honest I think it is notable judging by how much I've heard of it, but it really doesn't show in the article as it currently is. —  Jeraphine Gryphon ^{( talk)} 18:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC) reply

It says they're from the essay itself. Is that not a citation? Or do we just need someone to text search and make sure those quotes are all actually in it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.250.114 ( talk) 12:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC) reply