This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Language Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophy of language Linguistics: Theoretical Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

It seems to me that to say that 'arche' is synonymous with 'telos' is to Hegelianize the Greek language in a not very reasonable way: one means (roughly) origin, the other means (roughly) end. Also, what does "structure/genesis" mean? Are those supposed to be synonyms too? It seems to me that one of Derrida's major themes is the impossibility of collapsing those two terms (and this has been the case since the dissertation on Husserl, i.e., since his earliest work).