This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Antiphellus has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 4, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
The meaning of Antiphellus is "the land opposite the rocks", as stated by Bayburtluoğlu, who is an acknowledged expert of the region's ancient history. Phellus (meaning "rocks") was located inland and cannot be considered to be opposite Antiphellus, which served for a period as its port. Amitchell125 ( talk) 07:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Freedom4U ( talk · contribs) 05:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
In 1952, archaeologists showed that Antiphellus had only ever consisted of a few buildings.is just flat out untrue.
( British Museum)in the image caption?
The base has a moulding
most notableWhile the source does state this, I believe this is a peacock term.
7 - Clear
10 - excavators sank trial pits in numerous places at Kaş
is directly copied from source. The next part of the sentence also is too closely paraphrased to the original source.
12 - It states that the earthquake was strong, but does not mention the city or how it was affected. Citation 11 only mentions that the city was affected by the earthquake with no further information. Checking citation 13, I still have issues: 1) I can't find a mention of the tsunami relating to the city, 2) I'm questioning why the paragraph says "probably", when there's no sources stating that they were affected by an unknown earthquake, 3) where does it state "well-documented"?
19 - The quote jumps around, although I would suggest severely editing down this quote, you do also need to add an ellipsis if you're condensing what other people have written.
27 - Clear
28 - Clear
38 - Where was this originally published? Otherwise, clear.
44 - The page number is incorrect, but clear.
on the south side the wall is almost entirely destroyed down to ground-level, though its line is recognizable in places. The highest point is occupied by an enclosure with a rough wall surrounding a hollow now filled with scrub; this apparently represents a medieval fortification of the summit.Internet Archive :3 F4U ( they /it) 17:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
@ Freedom4U: The above points have now been addressed. Amitchell125 ( talk) 07:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Antiphellus has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 4, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
The meaning of Antiphellus is "the land opposite the rocks", as stated by Bayburtluoğlu, who is an acknowledged expert of the region's ancient history. Phellus (meaning "rocks") was located inland and cannot be considered to be opposite Antiphellus, which served for a period as its port. Amitchell125 ( talk) 07:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Freedom4U ( talk · contribs) 05:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
In 1952, archaeologists showed that Antiphellus had only ever consisted of a few buildings.is just flat out untrue.
( British Museum)in the image caption?
The base has a moulding
most notableWhile the source does state this, I believe this is a peacock term.
7 - Clear
10 - excavators sank trial pits in numerous places at Kaş
is directly copied from source. The next part of the sentence also is too closely paraphrased to the original source.
12 - It states that the earthquake was strong, but does not mention the city or how it was affected. Citation 11 only mentions that the city was affected by the earthquake with no further information. Checking citation 13, I still have issues: 1) I can't find a mention of the tsunami relating to the city, 2) I'm questioning why the paragraph says "probably", when there's no sources stating that they were affected by an unknown earthquake, 3) where does it state "well-documented"?
19 - The quote jumps around, although I would suggest severely editing down this quote, you do also need to add an ellipsis if you're condensing what other people have written.
27 - Clear
28 - Clear
38 - Where was this originally published? Otherwise, clear.
44 - The page number is incorrect, but clear.
on the south side the wall is almost entirely destroyed down to ground-level, though its line is recognizable in places. The highest point is occupied by an enclosure with a rough wall surrounding a hollow now filled with scrub; this apparently represents a medieval fortification of the summit.Internet Archive :3 F4U ( they /it) 17:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
@ Freedom4U: The above points have now been addressed. Amitchell125 ( talk) 07:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)