This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anthology of American Folk Music article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Anthology of American Folk Music was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SilkTork ( talk · contribs) 16:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer (the GA Bot doesn't notify nominators when I start a review because of this) - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements as I'm reading the article rather than list them here; if there is a lot of copy-editing to be done I may suggest getting an independent copy-editor (on the basis that a fresh set of eyes is helpful). Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria.
Nominators and interested users are free to response however they wish - inserting responses directly under each point I make is probably the best way, but please do whatever suits you. The thing that can get problematic is if someone other than me ticks off my query points as done and/or crosses out my text. If you have done something, please say so under my query, but allow me to check and make the decision as to if it is done or not - that way I know what I have checked and what I haven't. SilkTork ( talk)
</noinclude>
GA review – see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for detailed criteria
*I'm away for a few days and may not have time to work on this review, but if I do, it'll be under the account SilkTorkAway.
SilkTork (
talk) 06:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
*"he developed a hobby of collecting" - Did he develop a hobby or did he start a collection?
SilkTork (
talk) 16:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC) I've adjusted the comment.
SilkTork (
talk) 09:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anthology of American Folk Music article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Anthology of American Folk Music was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SilkTork ( talk · contribs) 16:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer (the GA Bot doesn't notify nominators when I start a review because of this) - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements as I'm reading the article rather than list them here; if there is a lot of copy-editing to be done I may suggest getting an independent copy-editor (on the basis that a fresh set of eyes is helpful). Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria.
Nominators and interested users are free to response however they wish - inserting responses directly under each point I make is probably the best way, but please do whatever suits you. The thing that can get problematic is if someone other than me ticks off my query points as done and/or crosses out my text. If you have done something, please say so under my query, but allow me to check and make the decision as to if it is done or not - that way I know what I have checked and what I haven't. SilkTork ( talk)
</noinclude>
GA review – see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for detailed criteria
*I'm away for a few days and may not have time to work on this review, but if I do, it'll be under the account SilkTorkAway.
SilkTork (
talk) 06:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
*"he developed a hobby of collecting" - Did he develop a hobby or did he start a collection?
SilkTork (
talk) 16:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC) I've adjusted the comment.
SilkTork (
talk) 09:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)