This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force. Women scientists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Australia Low‑importance Anne Buist is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi whoever reads this! I am Professor Anne Buist, the subject of this page. I wasn't involved in its creation or editing, although I can confirm that the content is accurate. So I didn't pay anyone, and I have confirmed with my publisher (Text Publishing) that they did not set up or edit the page (they don't do Wikipedia) and that they didn't pay anyone. Nor did my co-author / husband. Maybe someone at Wikipedia knows something that I don't, but I can't imagine anyone else who'd pay for me to be on Wikipedia. Hope this helps - I'm happy to be on Wikipedia, but don't like having 'suspected undisclosed payments' at the top of my article! You can contact me through my writing publicist lucy.ballantyne@textpublishing.com.au Regards Anne 203.47.107.242 ( talk) 01:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

There unfortunately has been editors working for pay on these articles it appears. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

DocJames can you explain or point to where this has been established? The SPI was closed with the comment that the editor's explanation was reasonable. Thanks, Melcous ( talk) 12:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

You linked the wrong person, I have a space in my user name. The concerns are fairly obvious if you look at the edits in question between the account in question for the topic in question. In an effort to not provide paid editors with all the details required to avoid detection I am disinclined to innumerate them here but could provide some details by email. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 18:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Oops, sorry about that both Doc Jameses! Okay, I have no real concern either way, it just seemed odd to me that the SPI accepts the key editor's alternative explanations for why the editing looks similar but they are not accepted here. Cheers, Melcous ( talk) 02:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC) reply