This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
novels,
novellas,
novelettes and
short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the
paranormal and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with
current tasks, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
This "incident" looks like a hoax. Even if it isn't, this is not notable enough for an article. If verifies, I guess it could be merged with some paranormal article.
DCEdwards1966 02:38, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, obvious fiction, prank, silly vandalism, could be a speedy.
Wyss 03:31, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, probable prank, 27 Google hits for James Worson.
JoaoRicardo 03:53, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Comment:. I wouldn't exactly qualify this as a prank or "fiction" in the true sense of the word. While not notable in the Google sense, this "incident" has been featured in various print books describing the supernatural. One should also consider the historical factor (an 1873 incident won't feature as prominently as other things). I'm making a comment instead of a vote because I don't know how much WP documents the "unexplained" (probably the same as "supernatural theories", ie, not much), but I can comment that this incident has been mentioned in various print books in the past. However, if you want an NPOV article, I can't see this being anything larger than a stub, so it probably deserves a merge, at most (and probably a delete, if WP doesn't usually document supernatural theories like this one). --
Deathphoenix 14:53, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
keep, no need for a merge - I've put an appropriate category on. This isn't a hoax (article, anyway; I remain of cours neutral on the incident itself). This IP has been contributing a few of these. I've added an appropriate category and a note on the IP's talk page -
David Gerard 17:57, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Weak Keep, cleanup and expand.
Megan1967 01:27, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
end moved discussion
For the benifit of
Wyss, this is fiction, but not by the wiki author. Hopefully the rewrite should help clear things up.
akaDruid 13:15, 9 May 2005 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
novels,
novellas,
novelettes and
short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the
paranormal and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with
current tasks, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
This "incident" looks like a hoax. Even if it isn't, this is not notable enough for an article. If verifies, I guess it could be merged with some paranormal article.
DCEdwards1966 02:38, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, obvious fiction, prank, silly vandalism, could be a speedy.
Wyss 03:31, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, probable prank, 27 Google hits for James Worson.
JoaoRicardo 03:53, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Comment:. I wouldn't exactly qualify this as a prank or "fiction" in the true sense of the word. While not notable in the Google sense, this "incident" has been featured in various print books describing the supernatural. One should also consider the historical factor (an 1873 incident won't feature as prominently as other things). I'm making a comment instead of a vote because I don't know how much WP documents the "unexplained" (probably the same as "supernatural theories", ie, not much), but I can comment that this incident has been mentioned in various print books in the past. However, if you want an NPOV article, I can't see this being anything larger than a stub, so it probably deserves a merge, at most (and probably a delete, if WP doesn't usually document supernatural theories like this one). --
Deathphoenix 14:53, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
keep, no need for a merge - I've put an appropriate category on. This isn't a hoax (article, anyway; I remain of cours neutral on the incident itself). This IP has been contributing a few of these. I've added an appropriate category and a note on the IP's talk page -
David Gerard 17:57, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Weak Keep, cleanup and expand.
Megan1967 01:27, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
end moved discussion
For the benifit of
Wyss, this is fiction, but not by the wiki author. Hopefully the rewrite should help clear things up.
akaDruid 13:15, 9 May 2005 (UTC)reply