This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
This article seems to be an automatic translation. It should be repaired. Nedim Ardoğa ( talk) 16:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Well than Super Turk Historian...do your work...
Dilek2 ( talk) 18:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
The Sources about Oghuz Khan is wellwritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.248.168.136 ( talk) 16:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
It was well given here in the english article by myself
But I dont know why it is changed
Here than in the original Turkish Article (but in Turkish language), is given the meaning of the name, history of the tribe etc.
I created it the english version, but people are must hate me or enjalous, dont know.
Sad
http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amuca_Kabilesi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.248.140.111 ( talk) 19:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
This article seems to be an automatic translation. It should be repaired. Nedim Ardoğa ( talk) 16:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Well than Super Turk Historian...do your work...
Dilek2 ( talk) 18:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
The Sources about Oghuz Khan is wellwritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.248.168.136 ( talk) 16:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
It was well given here in the english article by myself
But I dont know why it is changed
Here than in the original Turkish Article (but in Turkish language), is given the meaning of the name, history of the tribe etc.
I created it the english version, but people are must hate me or enjalous, dont know.
Sad
http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amuca_Kabilesi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.248.140.111 ( talk) 19:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC)