This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the source "shadowandact.com" and material cited to it. Upon closer examination, it is a user-generated content site, and so not a WP:RS for facts. Further discussion at User_talk:Tkmcguire1. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 03:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
That seems unfair, although technically allowed. In theory we could increase that section to account for 90% of the content of the page, and through sheer volume of counter-claims to the case, this would appear to readers be more trustworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.198.160.79 ( talk) 05:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the source "shadowandact.com" and material cited to it. Upon closer examination, it is a user-generated content site, and so not a WP:RS for facts. Further discussion at User_talk:Tkmcguire1. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 03:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
That seems unfair, although technically allowed. In theory we could increase that section to account for 90% of the content of the page, and through sheer volume of counter-claims to the case, this would appear to readers be more trustworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.198.160.79 ( talk) 05:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)