This article was nominated for deletion on 4 March 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Amesbury, Massachusetts.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Skiing and Snowboarding This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles United States: Massachusetts Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).

The contents of the Amesbury Sports Park page were merged into Amesbury, Massachusetts on 28 March 2013 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) -- Jrclark ( talk) 20:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Noted, historic, popular, and very visible (on the side of an Interstate highway) recreational area. Jrclark ( talk) 20:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Noted in what reliable sources? None are cited in the article thus it fails Notability. Roger ( talk) 20:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply