This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 27 July 2020, see discussion. keep, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC), see discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

• This seems to be an advertisement... Battosai
• Why do you say it's an advertisement? I don't think the content is much different than what is found on most other website entries on wikipedia, but if you think it is, let me know some suggestions so I can alter it. Tubutler

On 3 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/AmIAnnoying.com for a record of the discussion. — Korath ( Talk) 15:49, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Does anyone think that this website is suitable as a reliable source, or even an external link, in articles? I don't think it is, but it has been added to a few dozen articles (especially about Playboy playmates and minor actors). While we might not need to blacklist it, I think we should avoid using it for any information. - Will Beback · † · 20:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Unless a person's rating on amiannoying.com has been subject to notable press coverage, I don't think it adds encyclopedic value to the article on them. -- Siobhan Hansa 20:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Hayley Atwell by Gage Skidmore.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC) reply