From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Allison Hedge Coke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Broken code, unreferenced content, non-independent sources

I will again remove the content restored by Phenocia. There are several problems with it. Firstly, when Phenocia restored it, only the appearance was restored, not the wiki code. Thus, references were broken, and only non-functional tags (like [32][33]) remain. That could, of course, be fixed. Secondly, none of those references were reliable secondary sources. Primary sources can be used on Wikipedia, but only with extreme care, and not as the sole basis of large amounts of content. Basing arguably promotional sections only on primary sources is particularly inappropriate. Thirdly, large amounts of content did not cite any sources whatsoever. Fourthly, the "Career" section had many inline external links. That's not appropriate by our guideline on external links, and those did not point to reliable third-party sources anyway, often not even to websites mentioning Hedge Coke at all.

I will, however, add something based on the American Literature review of Hedge Coke's work. That is the only source formerly in the "critical reception" section that's helpful; all the others were broken links, non-independent, or otherwise unhelpful. Huon ( talk) 21:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC) reply

User:Phenocia and User:LissaStoner appear to be sockpuppets and likely are Allison Hedge Coke herself. This article has served as a promotional résumé instead of an encyclopedic entry. Thank you for your clean up efforts, User:Huon. Sincerely, Yuchitown ( talk) 23:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Yuchitown reply

Native identity

If you read the descriptions of the various tribal categories and the lengthy discussions throughout Wikipedia about Native American identity, living people absolutely have to be tribal members. Generally, there has to be some recognition by the tribes that the individual claims that the tribe in return acknowledges the individual as a member. Neither the Wyandotte Nation nor any Canadian First Nation has never acknowledged Coke as a member. Yuchitown ( talk) 15:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Yuchitown reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Allison Hedge Coke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Broken code, unreferenced content, non-independent sources

I will again remove the content restored by Phenocia. There are several problems with it. Firstly, when Phenocia restored it, only the appearance was restored, not the wiki code. Thus, references were broken, and only non-functional tags (like [32][33]) remain. That could, of course, be fixed. Secondly, none of those references were reliable secondary sources. Primary sources can be used on Wikipedia, but only with extreme care, and not as the sole basis of large amounts of content. Basing arguably promotional sections only on primary sources is particularly inappropriate. Thirdly, large amounts of content did not cite any sources whatsoever. Fourthly, the "Career" section had many inline external links. That's not appropriate by our guideline on external links, and those did not point to reliable third-party sources anyway, often not even to websites mentioning Hedge Coke at all.

I will, however, add something based on the American Literature review of Hedge Coke's work. That is the only source formerly in the "critical reception" section that's helpful; all the others were broken links, non-independent, or otherwise unhelpful. Huon ( talk) 21:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC) reply

User:Phenocia and User:LissaStoner appear to be sockpuppets and likely are Allison Hedge Coke herself. This article has served as a promotional résumé instead of an encyclopedic entry. Thank you for your clean up efforts, User:Huon. Sincerely, Yuchitown ( talk) 23:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Yuchitown reply

Native identity

If you read the descriptions of the various tribal categories and the lengthy discussions throughout Wikipedia about Native American identity, living people absolutely have to be tribal members. Generally, there has to be some recognition by the tribes that the individual claims that the tribe in return acknowledges the individual as a member. Neither the Wyandotte Nation nor any Canadian First Nation has never acknowledged Coke as a member. Yuchitown ( talk) 15:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Yuchitown reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook