A fact from Alkaptonuria appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Alkaptonuria.
|
PMID 9529368 is a recent overview, published in reaction to the linkage to the gene. Nitisinone, more commonly studied for hereditary tyrosinemia type I, is apparently being studied in this disease, see PMID 15322814. JFW | T@lk 23:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this shouldn't go for GA. JFW | T@lk 10:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
It is my understanding that these two are the same thing. If so, why don't we merge them? If not, please tell me how they are different. Thanks, -- Brendan19 ( talk) 00:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200877 is a review by the main UK expert team in Liverpool. Might be useful considering the article is currently weak in terms of sources. JFW | T@lk 22:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
From the article:
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)Fascinating, but I would prefer a secondary source, particularly because this is 37 years ago. JFW | T@lk 12:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
This 1968 article from the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde has a lot of historical context ( link):
It would be great to have a more recent source. JFW | T@lk 09:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
A fact from Alkaptonuria appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Alkaptonuria.
|
PMID 9529368 is a recent overview, published in reaction to the linkage to the gene. Nitisinone, more commonly studied for hereditary tyrosinemia type I, is apparently being studied in this disease, see PMID 15322814. JFW | T@lk 23:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm wondering if this shouldn't go for GA. JFW | T@lk 10:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
It is my understanding that these two are the same thing. If so, why don't we merge them? If not, please tell me how they are different. Thanks, -- Brendan19 ( talk) 00:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200877 is a review by the main UK expert team in Liverpool. Might be useful considering the article is currently weak in terms of sources. JFW | T@lk 22:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
From the article:
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)Fascinating, but I would prefer a secondary source, particularly because this is 37 years ago. JFW | T@lk 12:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
This 1968 article from the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde has a lot of historical context ( link):
It would be great to have a more recent source. JFW | T@lk 09:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)